The Ring Magazine: Ring title won't be on the line for Bradley-Alexander

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Drunk Punch
    In Asia
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2006
    • 5823
    • 172
    • 130
    • 12,619

    #31
    Haha Alexander, and his "who is Khan?" comments.

    Comment

    • Deep Blue 1997
      On to the Next One
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 846
      • 74
      • 126
      • 6,990

      #32
      that's a great call;

      right now Khan and Bradley are the obvious top 2 fighters in the division.

      only if those two fought can we really have closure in the weight class.

      (much like Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather in the welterweight division)

      Comment

      • Ko King 212
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2010
        • 2377
        • 97
        • 19
        • 8,702

        #33
        They should be fighting for it. Politricks is mothaf-cka in boxing.

        Comment

        • Dirk Diggler UK
          Deleted
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 48836
          • 1,312
          • 693
          • 58,902

          #34
          Originally posted by Ko King 212
          They should be fighting for it. Politricks is mothaf-cka in boxing.
          I was thinking exactly the same when Kotelnik got jobbed in St.Louis

          Comment

          • fightfan2007
            Contender
            • Jul 2008
            • 413
            • 24
            • 0
            • 6,558

            #35
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
            What about Alexander getting schooled by Kotelnik?

            Either way, Khan has a better resume at 140lbs than Alexander. Can you dispute this?
            Was trying not to go for the cheap shots... but Alexander beat Witter who beat Kotelnik when he was undefeated... im no believer in triangle theories but its an easy cheap shot lol

            Either way what? Everything i said in my last post was fact... and lets not over hype Khan's win over Kotelnik... he flurried on gloves then ran away everytime... clear win on activity but not exactly an impressive performance... and most importantly he didnt EARN it... Warren paid for it.

            Amir's duck record is better than his actual resume... I like Khan, he got skills but he has to earn respect... Salita, ***an and light punchers dont impress me much.

            And why not rematch Prescott instead of targetting Peterson or McCloskey?

            After watching how much he struggled against Maidana i reckon Corley would put a hurting on him.

            I'm no hater... I honestly thought Amir would school Marcos to a late stoppage - and im not just saying that - I went to the bookies and put good money on that outcome.... I was both surprised and dissapointed by how poorly he boxed that night... Altho he deserves mad props for heart and grit it should never have been that tough.

            Anyway my original point here is that the Ring magazine are biased towards GBP fighters... if Alexander was GBP do you honestly reckon the title wouldnt be on the line ??

            Comment

            • fightfan2007
              Contender
              • Jul 2008
              • 413
              • 24
              • 0
              • 6,558

              #36
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
              I was thinking exactly the same when Kotelnik got jobbed in St.Louis
              Same way MAB got jobbed in Manchester... swings and roundabouts bro

              Comment

              • Dirk Diggler UK
                Deleted
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 48836
                • 1,312
                • 693
                • 58,902

                #37
                Originally posted by fightfan2007
                Was trying not to go for the cheap shots... but Alexander beat Witter who beat Kotelnik when he was undefeated... im no believer in triangle theories but its an easy cheap shot lol

                Either way what? Everything i said in my last post was fact... and lets not over hype Khan's win over Kotelnik... he flurried on gloves then ran away everytime... clear win on activity but not exactly an impressive performance... and most importantly he didnt EARN it... Warren paid for it.

                Amir's duck record is better than his actual resume... I like Khan, he got skills but he has to earn respect... Salita, ***an and light punchers dont impress me much.

                And why not rematch Prescott instead of targetting Peterson or McCloskey?

                After watching how much he struggled against Maidana i reckon Corley would put a hurting on him.

                I'm no hater... I honestly thought Amir would school Marcos to a late stoppage - and im not just saying that - I went to the bookies and put good money on that outcome.... I was both surprised and dissapointed by how poorly he boxed that night... Altho he deserves mad props for heart and grit it should never have been that tough.

                Anyway my original point here is that the Ring magazine are biased towards GBP fighters... if Alexander was GBP do you honestly reckon the title wouldnt be on the line ??
                So can you dispute that Khan has a better resume than Alexander? Yes or no?

                Comment

                • Dirk Diggler UK
                  Deleted
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 48836
                  • 1,312
                  • 693
                  • 58,902

                  #38
                  Originally posted by fightfan2007
                  Same way MAB got jobbed in Manchester... swings and roundabouts bro
                  What a horrible comparison. MAB lost every round before it was stopped....he was getting his arse handed to him.

                  Alexander was outclassed by Kotelnik over 12 full rounds.

                  Stop it.

                  Comment

                  • mrlopez
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Apr 2008
                    • 4769
                    • 207
                    • 858
                    • 23,315

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                    So can you dispute that Khan has a better resume than Alexander? Yes or no?
                    you say Khan has a better resume, i say he has a loss by horrendous KO in the 1st round......

                    Alexander is a unified champ, and although he didnt look to good vs kotelnik, he's still undefeated.....

                    Comment

                    • Dirk Diggler UK
                      Deleted
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 48836
                      • 1,312
                      • 693
                      • 58,902

                      #40
                      Originally posted by mrlopez
                      you say Khan has a better resume, i say he has a loss by horrendous KO in the 1st round......

                      Alexander is a unified champ, and although he didnt look to good vs kotelnik, he's still undefeated.....
                      Yeah because of corrupt hometown judges

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP