Comments Thread For: Team Klitschko Doubt David Haye, No Vitali in May
Collapse
-
-
Called it. So predictable.
This guy is so delusional, he thinks Liverpool have won an extra league title when they're a relegation team now.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Based on how things have gone in the past, I doubt Haye will ever fight a Klitschko. I don't think its all his fault though. Both sides should be doing everything they can to make the fight but they obviously aren't.Comment
-
nope, EVERYONE knows who canceled the fight,HAYE!(Thats fact haye said if Wlad fights Chisora in april we will not fight Wlad on july 2nd) right there Haye stated that HE wil not fight Wlad,Wlad never said he would not fight Haye,in fact Wlad says the july 2nd fight is still open for Haye to sign to fight if he wants it)Comment
-
You're right about that. Did Haye ever give a reason why it bothered him so much that Wlad took a fight in between the July second date?nope, EVERYONE knows who canceled the fight,HAYE!(Thats fact haye said if Wlad fights Chisora in april we will not fight Wlad on july 2nd) right there Haye stated that HE wil not fight Wlad,Wlad never said he would not fight Haye,in fact Wlad says the july 2nd fight is still open for Haye to sign to fight if he wants it)Comment
-
Comment
-
That was fine with Klitschko with one caveat: He will have gone nine-plus months without fighting. So he rescheduled his postponed fight with journeyman Dereck Chisora for April 30 as a tune-up.
That didn’t sit well with Haye and his handlers, who doubt that Klitschko would actually fight twice in nine weeks and worry that he might get cut.
Richard Schaefer of Golden Boy Promotions, Haye’s U.S. representative, went so far as to tell the Los Angeles Times that Klitschko’s decision to fight Chisora was “a deal killer.”
"Klitschko claims he'll fight both Chisora and I, but it's nonsense,” Haye said in a news release. “Are we expected to believe that a fighter that competed only once in the whole of 2009 and twice in 2010 is now going to box twice in a matter of nine weeks?
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment