Tweet
LMaO 
jajajaja **** this belts men
jajajaja **** this belts men
-
-
the WBC is technically right about what they are saying though. Pascal-Dawson was not a rematch that the WBC ordered.Originally posted by Sweet Jesus View PostMan you are a complete idiot. The WBC doesn't make the rules. Pascal is fighting Dawson next. If he doesn't, he will lose all his money in the court of law.
WBC making rulings.
****** bitch.
I think more than likely what will happen is pascal-dawson will go ahead and pascal will be stripped, giving hopkins a vacant title fight against somebody.Comment
-
I don't get how boxing fans can be that unintelligent. These guys actually think a sanctioning body gets to decide who fights who nowadays. They think that a sanctioning body can overrule a contract that is enforced by the court of law.Originally posted by El C@cique@PR View PostLMaO jajajaja **** this belts men
They think one of the most corrupt organizations in the entire world runs boxing.
Comment
-
Bro. The WBC doesn't mean anything. Their organization is meaningless. Their belt is meaningless. Their judgments are meaningless. The WBC has absolutely no relevance when it comes to Dawson-Pascal II. Absolutely none.Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Post
What you are seeing is the pretension of the WBC. Nothing that they say matters BECAUSE THEY DON'T MATTER.Comment
-
2nd Diamond Belt match, and still no requirements on what you actually have to do to compete for the ****ing thing.
I thought in the build up to Pac-Cotto they said it was for catchweights only?Comment
-
HBO is not contractually obligated to show the Dawson-Pascal rematch (the fight no one wants to see except Spray and Sweet Jesus).
If they show it, that fight will happen,
If they don't, showtime will get Hopkins-Pascal (the fight everyone wants to see)Comment
-
Another one of these little belts? They literally don't mean anything man.Comment
-
lol are you being serious? sanctioning body dictates who fights who all the time. not always but they do.Originally posted by Sweet Jesus View Post
They aren't overruling a contract by pascal-dawson. What the WBC is saying is that they had NOTHING to do with any contract between dawson-pascal and it was never sanctioned/authorized by the WBC. It really isn't that hard to figure out.They think that a sanctioning body can overrule a contract that is enforced by the court of law.
If pascal-dawson want to proceed with the fight, they have every right to do so. it just wont be for the wbc belt.Comment
-
Listen closely. A mandatory challenger doesn't mean anything. You drop the belt and you don't have to fight him. A contractual rematch does mean something. You don't fight, you get taken to court and sued.Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Post
Yes I know. That's what I've said with my last 2 posts in this thread. My comments are directed at all those in this thread that think that all of the sudden Pascal-Hopkins II is next because Jose fucking Sulaiman said so.They aren't overruling a contract by pascal-dawson. What the WBC is saying is that they had NOTHING to do with any contract between dawson-pascal and it was never sanctioned/authorized by the WBC. It really isn't that hard to figure out.
If pascal-dawson want to proceed with the fight, they have every right to do so. it just wont be for the wbc belt.
Comment
-
They do to guys who fight their whole lives to get one of them gold belts.Originally posted by VAW-JR View Post
Not that I agree with that, but the fact remains that the belts mean a lot as a trophy.
I know if I was a fighter, I'd want to keep one of them big gold belts, especially if it was one of the big 4 sanctioning bodies or ringComment
Comment