Comments Thread For: Bernard Hopkins: Black Fighters, We Are Built Differently

[iNDOLiFER]

.. it doesnt matter if your black or white!

[U.ncleSam]

Black are athletically superior race, they're talented too, good singers and dancers on the average. But they are intellectually inferior. You can't have everything. Go to Harvard or MIT, you'll barely see a black student there.

[iNDOLiFER]

the brotha feels that they have to be superior in all because of their size advantages over the rest.. and when they feel threaten they retreat and start to call foul play and accuse that person of cheating!

[iNDOLiFER]

why cant we all just get along? black, white, yellow and brown.. im on here to talk boxing! if i wanted to be racist and throw racist comments at eachother i would go join a racist club group! one thing about the majority of blacks is that they will not give a person of a different race full credit for what that person has accomplished. Theres always gotta be something that the blacks will say.. and this thread just proves it.. its always oh he's not the best until he beat a great black boxer! funny thing is there is no great black boxer at the moment LOL..

[Proff Griff]

imagine if a white swimmer (Michael Phelps for instance) came out and said "us whites are superior at swimming then the muscle bound blacks, who pretty much sink and struggle in the water, we are gentically superior"

oh my lord, there would be an uproar.

who remembers Eric the eel at the olympics? lol

Where was the "uproar" for this? This coming from your white heroes:


There is no doubt that Jack Nicklaus is one of the greatest golfers--if not the greatest golfer--who ever played the sport. He has also been a strong proponent for integrating golf. He has ownerships in many country clubs and has designed golf courses with the understanding that each establishment must be integrated. He is, indeed, a great ambassador of the ******* cause.

Unfortunately, he also displays a racist attitude shared by many white ******** in this country. This attitude can be called the "Jack Nicklaus syndrome" because Nicklaus illustrated it so clearly in July 1994. He said that the reason there are not more African-American golfers playing at the highest level in the sport is because blacks have "different muscles that react in different ways."



http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...6/ai_18501026/



Darrell Gates



Gates earned notoriety for his controversial rhetoric on many occasions. Some of the most notable examples of this were:

His testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee that infrequent or casual drug users "ought to be taken out and shot" because "we're in a war" and even casual drug use is "treason."[14] He later said the testimony was calculated hyperbole.[15]
His dismissive response to concerns about excessive force by police employing "choke holds." Gates attributed several deaths of people held in choke holds to the theory that "blacks might be more likely to die from chokeholds because their arteries do not open as fast as they do on 'normal people.'"[16] (In his autobiography, Gates explained that he had been misquoted, saying that black people were more predisposed to vascular conditions and therefore less likely to have normally-functioning arteries.)

[Mayas]

blacks are only good at speed.

But when the going gets tough, they have to cheat by using steroids.

In Boxing, fighters like Mosley, Campbell, Randall had to use steroids to beat Mexican champions.

[Cash Cow]

Black are athletically superior race, they're talented too, good singers and dancers on the average. But they are intellectually inferior. You can't have everything. Go to Harvard or MIT, you'll barely see a black student there.

I'll explain in a rational way.

People who are builders, creators, creatives, have a specific kind of intelligence. It's an intelligence you are unable to value. Jazz was invented by black people, along with rock & roll, and most of modern music, but you don't pay much attention to any of that.

Before that, the pyramids were invented in Egypt and built. Building and creative intelligence is not the same as destructive or war intelligence. Africans were good and are good at builting stuff, and being creative, designing cultures, and at inventing tribal forms of government.

The Native Americans were good at this too, they protected the earth, they were better with the land, and better at governing themselves. The difference is, they were not aggressive and good at war. Egyptians if you look, they never were a major military force, the Romans always had a better military. If you look at Africa, Africa was never the military might of the world, it was always Europe.

The culture of Egypt was extremely religious and people built pyramids as a religious act. The tribes in Africa had no concept of war, and the concepts they had were absolutely nothing like what Europeans had. In African tribes, they were waging wars which usually was more like a ritual, where the strongest of the tribe, usually just 2 people, would fight 1 on 1 and that would settle it. Sometimes it would be a few people, but they'd all fight 1 on 1, there was no concept of organized war on the scale you think of, thats why they used spears.

The difference was Europeans came in with guns, which were hundreds of years more advanced in war technology. At this time the Africans were hundreds of years more advanced in governing techniques and in diplomacy, most of their problems were solved through rituals, many Africans thought wars were to be faught in a ritualized and fair way, but Europeans came in with guns and there was nothing fair about it.

This happened because Europeans got the gun first, thats all. The same happens with Native Americans, they had a federal government, a federation of tribes, and they had the land all divided up and everything worked out to have years if not centuries of peaceful conflict resolution, then some new people came in with guns and all they had was bow and arrow, they did not have the WEAPONS technology.

The Africans and Native Americans had language, both had music, both had culture, both had clothing, both had housing, both had water, food, government, they had all they needed to live off the land for hundreds of thousands of years, and were invaded by another culture.

Europeans developed weapons because they were used to fighting, and moving, and it was in their culture to conquer. The Chinese who you say were so smart ,and who invented gun power for fireworks, got invaded and conquered by the British. Why? Because the Chinese built a wall to hide from the barbarians on the outside, they didnt know how far ahead of them Europeans were, or about guns until it was too late, by the time they started using gunpowder to make guns, Europeans had cannons.

The only thing that mattered was which group of people were the best warriors. I'm guessing JB is a warrior himself. Someone like JB would have conquered many people, and then after ruling over them, claim them all to be inferior. It's might that decides who is intelligent and who isnt, it's decided by military might. So right now it's obvious that Europeans are the most intelligent, because they conquered the world to prove it, but this does not mean the Europeans were as good at building civilizations as the Egyptians or the Native Americans, I mean hell, why do you think black people were chosen to build the USA?

It's one thing to build guns, it's another thing to build railroads and entire cities. Yes white people can build too, but slavery certainly made it cheaper.
What can we learn from Egyptian / African culture and Native American culture? How to be sustainable and last for over 5000 years. How to build civilizations which won't collapse or destroy and pollute the earth.

I'm not saying Egypt or Native American civilizations would never collapse, I'm simply saying we can learn from these long lasting old civilization styles, Native Americans had decentralized government before the western world knew what it was, and Egyptians and Africans had socialism before the west knew what that was.

Basically, all the stuff we do now, was done back then under different names. If we study ancient society we can learn a lot. Sure, study Rome, study the Greeks, but also study Egypt, and also study African tribes, and Native tribes. It can only help you to take the best ideas humans have invented and apply them regardless of what bodies these ideas came from. If they work, use them.

[Cash Cow]

Black are athletically superior race, they're talented too, good singers and dancers on the average. But they are intellectually inferior. You can't have everything. Go to Harvard or MIT, you'll barely see a black student there.

you know absolutely nothing about Egyptians or Black people. Intelligence comes in different forms. Who built most of America? Who lead the way designing American culture?

Intelligence exists, but I guess because it's not military intelligence you assume that it does not exist, or perhaps you want to give ancient Egyptians an IQ test?

Being able to build great things and works of art, is creative intelligence.

[Mr. Philadel]

blacks are only good at speed.

But when the going gets tough, they have to cheat by using steroids.

In Boxing, fighters like Mosley, Campbell, Randall had to use steroids to beat Mexican champions.

[Mr. Philadel]

the brotha feels that they have to be superior in all because of their size advantages over the rest.. and when they feel threaten they retreat and start to call foul play and accuse that person of cheating!