Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How the media handled Bonds PED issue..

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by HandSpeed303 View Post
    If memory serves, Bonds mentioned using the "clear' on a couple of occassions. Plus his name was tied to the Balco thing.
    Please show the world where bonds admitted, PLEASE.

    The Bonds I know pled the 5th to every question except his name.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Needles View Post
      Probably because the consequence of exposing manny now would yield far worse outcome to everyone around him and to those who benefits off his accomplishments.

      Do you honestly think the philippine media would be un-biased on this issue? they kiss his ass in there constantly 24/7

      Do you honestly think those filipinos would want it to come out? those people have nothing to do besides oggle and follow manny's footsteps online and IRL

      Do you honestly think big sponsor companies would want manny to get exposed as a dirty cheat? think about potential lost revenues if they reveal manny. It wouldnt be wise since he is now on a winning streak and has a plate full of washed up fighters to pick from. They have to ride it out, milk him dry before they expose him.

      Do you honestly think those boxing businessmen want a huge embarassment of this great magnitude? with UFC ever increasing, now isnt really the time to turn people off boxing. would you be surprised if texas had really "clean" results for pacquiao? think about that
      We're not just talking about Philippine Media here. American Media has much to say against Pacquiao if he was really into PEDs, but nothing came out of it. Why? because there are no sources (stories of insiders/people involved in the Pacquiao's training) that can trace to Pacquiao's using PEDs, mainly because there is indeed no truth in it. Unlike that of Bonds.

      Secondly, do you honestly think that people in the boxing world, businessmen as you say, would continue supporting Pacquiao if he is indeed using PEDs? I'm sure like Bonds, boxing businessmen and sponsors will certainly leave Pacquiao on his own even at the first sign that Pacquiao is actually using PEDs.

      Thirdly, you seem to be saying that everyone in the boxing world, writers, fans and businessmen are all obviously protecting Pacquiao so that boxing won't go down to the pits, which is very confusing because you are implying that there is a kind of a grand conspiracy in all these merely to protect Pacquiao and their boxing investment.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by PAC&PBFsuck View Post
        Please show the world where bonds admitted, PLEASE.

        The Bonds I know pled the 5th to every question except his name.
        Im not saying he said he used during the season. Bonds was injured, and stated the reason his name was ever on the Balco list was for rehab reasons. And stated that he rubbed the "clear" onto his knee.

        That is the point though, they can't prove that he used doing the season. I never said he admitted using during the season. He was on the list for a reason though. So he clearly got something from Balcon, right?

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by namme View Post
          We're not just talking about Philippine Media here. American Media has much to say against Pacquiao if he was really into PEDs, but nothing came out of it. Why? because there are no sources (stories of insiders/people involved in the Pacquiao's training) that can trace to Pacquiao's using PEDs, mainly because there is indeed no truth in it. Unlike that of Bonds.

          Secondly, do you honestly think that people in the boxing world, businessmen as you say, would continue supporting Pacquiao if he is indeed using PEDs? I'm sure like Bonds, boxing businessmen and sponsors will certainly leave Pacquiao on his own even at the first sign that Pacquiao is actually using PEDs.

          Thirdly, you seem to be saying that everyone in the boxing world, writers, fans and businessmen are all obviously protecting Pacquiao so that boxing won't go down to the pits, which is very confusing because you are implying that there is a kind of a grand conspiracy in all these merely to protect Pacquiao and their boxing investment.
          Why isn't it possible, baseball did it. The Mitchell report and Canseco made baseball look so bad, that the ratings went down.

          Now they have tougher testing, not the boxing testing where they just ask the fighter if he's drugs.

          Can you imaging if boxing's ratings went any lower? MMA would love that.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by HandSpeed303 View Post
            Im not saying he said he used during the season. Bonds was injured, and stated the reason his name was ever on the Balco list was for rehab reasons. And stated that he rubbed the "clear" onto his knee.

            That is the point though, they can't prove that he used doing the season. I never said he admitted using during the season. He was on the list for a reason though. So he clearly got something from Balcon, right?
            I see, and Canseco snitched on him

            what's up with your Raiders, why did they fire Tom?

            Comment


            • #36
              Because Americans care more about Baseball than they do about boxing. Most Americans look at boxing as a dirty, barbaric sport anyway, so they don't care. If Americans cared more about Boxing like they do Baseball, Football and Basketball, then we would see way tougher drug testing for boxers.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by PAC&PBFsuck View Post
                I see, and Canseco snitched on him

                what's up with your Raiders, why did they fire Tom?
                Bold: I don't know, but i didn't like the move, but I have no choice but to roll with it.

                The players don't like it though.

                On topic: I don't like this topic to be honest...I don't know. I just think some cats try to hard.


                On A Side Note: A doctor from Canada was busted bringing a trunk load of HGH and steriods into the states...That doctor had a list of athletes he perscibed HGH to. Guess who's name was on the list, Tiger Woods. Tiger amitted using it when asked about it (he had a knee injury). The other golfers tried to cry about it, but Tiger has never tested positve for PEDS. The issue calmed very quickly, propaly do to the crazy year Tiger already had.

                The point is, can we assume Tiger is still on HGH? Or do to his performance as of late, is his mind ****ed, or can we assume that now that his doctor got caught, his performance is suffering?

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by BoxingTech718 View Post
                  Because Americans care more about Baseball than they do about boxing. Most Americans look at boxing as a dirty, barbaric sport anyway, so they don't care. If Americans cared more about Boxing like they do Baseball, Football and Basketball, then we would see way tougher drug testing for boxers.
                  My belief is that boxing is waiting for PAC to leave, and I think then they will start demanding tougher testing.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by PAC&PBFsuck View Post
                    Why isn't it possible, baseball did it. The Mitchell report and Canseco made baseball look so bad, that the ratings went down.

                    Now they have tougher testing, not the boxing testing where they just ask the fighter if he's drugs.

                    Can you imaging if boxing's ratings went any lower? MMA would love that.
                    I don't understand.

                    Are you saying that it is possible that there is a grand conspiracy in protecting Pacquiao from all accusations against him of taking PEDs, mainly because it will affect the sports of boxing? If so, then you must also be implying then that all the people who are involved in this "conspiracy" this must be fans of Pacquiao.

                    Man, don't you think that you are bringing this a bit too far? You seem to be saying that almost everyone in the boxing world agree that Pacquiao is the face of boxing, and they need to protect Pacquiao because he represents Boxing. If he goes down, then everyone else goes down too.

                    Don't you think that that is a bit off: saving their a$$e$ by shielding Pacquiao of all accusations about PEDs? What about their freedom to do what is right and fair? What about their capacity to write and act based on honest opinions? What about the truth?

                    I'm saying this, because I don't believe people are gullible to be hooked into such a thing as a grand conspiracy just to protect the sports of boxing...and all at the expense of honesty, truth and justice.
                    Last edited by namme; 01-09-2011, 11:46 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by namme View Post
                      I don't understand.

                      Are you saying that it is possible that there is a grand conspiracy in protecting Pacquiao from all accusations against him of taking PEDs, mainly because it will affect the sports of boxing? If so, then you must also be implying then that all the people who are involved in this "conspiracy" this must be fans of Pacquiao.

                      Man, don't you think that you are bringing this a bit too far? You seem to be saying that almost everyone in the boxing world agree that Pacquiao is the face of boxing, and they need to protect Pacquiao because he represents Boxing. If he goes down, then everyone else goes down too.

                      Don't you think that that is a bit off? Saving their a$$e$ by shielding Pacquiao of all accusations about PEDs? What about their freedom to do what is right and fair? What about their capacity to write and act based on honest opinions? What about the truth?

                      I'm saying this, because I don't believe people are gullible to be hooked into such a thing as a grand conspiracy to protect the sports of boxing at the expense of honesty, truth and justice.
                      If the comission wanted to they could just throw a test, do they have to really show that they passed, NO.

                      I'll tell you how baseball got caught.

                      In 2003, the MLBPA and MLB agreed to a test that the public would never know about, they just wanted to see the % of players on steroids.

                      Players were supposed to take the test and the test were supposed to get burned in flames. Somebody thought otherwise and kept all the test results and that's how baseball was put on the spot.

                      So you see, if a commission wants to protect it's investment they can.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP