Comments Thread For: Pascal-Hopkins Rematch Ordered, Purse Bid on Feb. 4

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Russian Crushin
    atheist with a gun
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2009
    • 33788
    • 1,471
    • 836
    • 46,625

    #11
    Originally posted by bazookajoe
    the wbc rules do state that the board can vote for an immediate rematch if there was controversy in the fight. i am of the opinion b-hop got robbed, so i understand the wbc position.

    let's face it though, tv and successful gate at this level is NOT contingent on having a belt.

    i'd rather see pascal/b-hop three more times than pascal-dawson twice. i'm biased, i know...
    Doesnt matter what want to see, it matters what is right.

    I want to see this fight more then Dawson/Pascal but in no way is this right. Plus they put Pascal is a bad predicament where he gets ****ed no matter right

    The only reason you think they got it right is because you want to see this fight, not because its the right thing to do.

    Comment

    • Sweet Jesus
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 11512
      • 568
      • 332
      • 13,576

      #12
      Who gives a crap? Pascal is the Ring LHW champ.

      Comment

      • Black-Panther
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Dec 2010
        • 197
        • 34
        • 36
        • 6,591

        #13
        My man Hopkins will punish him harder next time

        Comment

        • BoxingTech718
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2010
          • 4646
          • 300
          • 217
          • 25,563

          #14
          This is BS the commission is overstepping itself here. Dawson and Pascal have a clear contract for a rematch. Hopkins needs to do the right thing and wait his turn and face the winner.

          Comment

          • damned1974
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2009
            • 3981
            • 472
            • 323
            • 16,857

            #15
            This fight is more warranted than the Dawson rematch...the rematch with Dawson is an issue of contract outside of the commision.Hopkins should have won the first time they met....Dawson can have Hopkins leftovers again (just like Tarver,Johnson,etc) after he wins his belts and makes history.

            Comment

            • Dirk Diggler UK
              Deleted
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 48836
              • 1,312
              • 693
              • 58,902

              #16
              On what grounds has his rematch been "ordered"?

              Comment

              • Ogecca MaMa
                Captain Gym
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2009
                • 3538
                • 410
                • 1,364
                • 48,169

                #17
                WBC did everything what they should of.

                They know Hopkins is ****ing 46 years old.. that is why, they want him to give immedeate rematch, Plus rematch with Hopkins will bring on table more $, than rematch with Dawson.

                Execution Time!

                Comment

                • deanrw
                  Mayor Ford's dealer...
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 13095
                  • 1,047
                  • 1,007
                  • 1,860,285

                  #18
                  The WBC has deep pockets and Golden Boy has lots of money.

                  This is why the decision was made. No and's If's Or But's.

                  Expect to see Shaw start suing from this one.

                  Comment

                  • Shabba Rank$
                    ~Swift~
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 5994
                    • 336
                    • 319
                    • 13,526

                    #19
                    Originally posted by BoxingTech718
                    This is BS the commission is overstepping itself here. Dawson and Pascal have a clear contract for a rematch. Hopkins needs to do the right thing and wait his turn and face the winner.
                    This........................

                    Comment

                    • muddogg
                      Amateur
                      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 19
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      • 7,209

                      #20
                      This is BS.. If there was no rematch clause for Dawson, it makes sense, but to force him to break a legal contract is garbage.. But lets not 4got, in purse bids, the champ gets something like a 70-30 split (B-hop will NEVER agree to this), and if Pascals team wins the bid, they pick the location (Canada) .. Again B-Hop doesnt take the fight.. Allowing Pascal to fight his legal rematch!! Then offer B-hop a fair contract (Pascal seems to be a fair guy and will do just this!) So they do have a creative out if they want to make a more just decision!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP