Can somebody please explain how Mosley is a better choice......

[iNDOLiFER]

You're right, Sr. and the rest accused Manny in Oct. of `09 yet it's 2011 and you're still on that subject, what the hell was I thinking.

i havent even been on this site for weeks how am i still on that subject??? i never made any threads about it.. unlike someone.

[iNDOLiFER]

no body is going to say he ducked mosley if manny would of fought jmm because he already avoided mosley when he was considered a legitimate threat even after this fight people who feel manny avoided shane are still going to think he avoided shane because fighting him now doesn't make up for you not fighting him when he was top 3 p4p and #1 ww

that will give them even more reasons to say pac duck mosley if pac was to fight jmm instead.. dont front.

[Check_hooks]

Pacquiao already whooped piss drinkers ass twice. And then he wanted 5 million upfront and alot off the PPV. So he also over priced himself.

He's not even a ppv attraction so F him.

[RIZO24]

oh i'm sorry. i forgot EVERYONE ducks jmm and jmm ducks no one.

LMFAO


jmm was crying about gbp trying to "set him up" when they proposed a khan fight.

Here watch for yourself!! Khan was the number one contender but chose not to fight Marquez. He said he wasnt ready after beating Barrera, Nah he just wanted JM Marquez to get older a little more battlw worn!! It's alright JM Marquez will still school Khan!!

[PACnPBFsuck]

You will get very few responses to this post. None of the *******s can give a logical explanation as to why their god chose to fight an aging, over-the-hill fighter that has looked terrible in his last two fights and that Pacquaio refused to fight two years ago because he was "too good," instead of a top five P4P fighter who has been fighting very well in the last two years and who gave Pacquaio the two most competitive fights of his career (with the exception of the two fights in which Pac was knocked out).

I would be shocked if you get more than 30 responses. If you get that many, 20 of them will be talking about Mayweather and not responding directly to your question.

I know that Mosley doesn't have a promotional so Arum would be able to keep more money.

I understand that, but what good is a fight that might not produce that many buys.:bukkake:

[Khalid X]

I don't even get this argument because if Shane and Marquez fought at 147, Shane is knocking JMM the Fvvk out.

I don't like Berto, but even he destroys Marquez at 147.

And the real kicker.....Amir khan at 140 makes easy work of Marquez.

Dude should just forget about Manny and focus on those guys at 135. People bring up those fights at 126 & 130 but that was ages ago.

At one point in time Larry was competive with his brother Michael (Jordan)...but key words "at one point".

Same **** with Manny and JMM. Yeah it was competive back in the day but right now Manny is on another level and kills this dude if they fought now.

[horge]

Everyone knows JMM/Pac would've made huge money. Way more than a crap fight with Mosley that nobody wanted.

Already addressed on the very first page of this thread.
The only common point of reference between Shane and JMM
is Floyd: compare the revenue from Floyd-JMM to Floyd-Shane,
review the purse cut demands of Shane and JMM wrt Pacquiao,
and then get back to me with your "way more" comment.

There was actual demand for this which would translate into big money.

No doubt, but see above.
Bottom line is that for comparable net revenue to TR/Pac, Shane
represented far less grief/hassle in negotiations.

They wanted Mosley because Arum doesn't want Pac to get his ass kicked and lose.

So, you believe JMM would deffo kick Pac's ass at 140 and up?
If Pac and JMM never do III, at least you can sustain that belief.

[letsgobrady]

that will give them even more reasons to say pac duck mosley if pac was to fight jmm instead.. dont front.

so fight a mosley who no one feels is at his best or is even relavent because people say you avoided him 3 fights ago so what took hin so long to fight shane?if it's the way you say it is wouldn't people also say he is avoiding marquez and berto? so why not fight marquez or berto now while they are looked at as good live opponents instead of fighting them later on after loses and bad performances just to say he didn't duck them

[STRUGG]

Its a terrible choice.............should have gone with berto or sergio ............in my opinion.................probably loss to SMAR.............but thats what non ducking/non mayweather do...........................fight the best possible options.......

[letsgobrady]

I don't even get this argument because if Shane and Marquez fought at 147, Shane is knocking JMM the Fvvk out.

I don't like Berto, but even he destroys Marquez at 147.

And the real kicker.....Amir khan at 140 makes easy work of Marquez.

Dude should just forget about Manny and focus on those guys at 135. People bring up those fights at 126 & 130 but that was ages ago.

At one point in time Larry was competive with his brother Michael (Jordan)...but key words "at one point".

Same **** with Manny and JMM. Yeah it was competive back in the day but right now Manny is on another level and kills this dude if they fought now.

wasn't this fight about 3 years ago?
it's funny how manny doesn't have to fight marquez because such and such would beat him.