What a moron you are gotta love american hypocrites like you : "honest and unbiased officials in the states". Americans did the biggest robbery of the year in the Kotelnik-Alexander match when Kotelnik completely dominated, did another one on the pacman undercard and Andre Ward is fighting with corrupted judges & refs in Oakland look at the scoring of the fight against Bika by far one of the worst of the year. Pascal-Hopkins was a very close fight who could have gone either way a draw is a fair result. Pathetic american hypocrites and whiners like you are very funny.
Comments Thread For: WBC: Pascal-Hopkins Immediate Rematch Order Looms
Collapse
-
I'm on the fence on this one. Hopkins deserves the rematch more, but, Dawson is guaranteed next fight with Pascal. I don't want Hops to be another year older before he gets another shot, but I also would hate to see him stall out the division and avoid Bad Chad if he wins.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Pascal has more to prove against Hopkins than he has against Dawson. Hopkins deserve to have his rematch before Chad Dawson. But it's not the WBC who will decide of Pascal's next opponent, it's HBO, and they want Chad Dawson to have his rematch...Comment
-
I.m.o.......
The knock downs were the CLEAR difference in that fight. Most of you who thought HOPKINS won, believe so because he's 45. I think he won some of you over with that pitch. The fact of the matter is, it's hard to STATISTICALLY win a fight when you are CLEARLY knocked down twice. YES? So, let's keep that in mind. PASCAL didn't hit the canvas and wasn't in jeopardy of doing so. In a close fight, you have to give it to the fighter who stayed on his feet. You knew if the fight was close, HOPKINS would claim robbery. The same way he did against TAYLOR. He won't give the honest assessment of what really happened. And that's sad. GOOD DAY.Comment
-
LOL at the WBC. shaw is right. they can vote all they want but pascal is contractually obligated to fight dawson. this just means pascal will be strippedComment
-
I.m.o.......
The knock downs were the CLEAR difference in that fight. Most of you who thought HOPKINS won, believe so because he's 45. I think he won some of you over with that pitch. The fact of the matter is, it's hard to STATISTICALLY win a fight when you are CLEARLY knocked down twice. YES? So, let's keep that in mind. PASCAL didn't hit the canvas and wasn't in jeopardy of doing so. In a close fight, you have to give it to the fighter who stayed on his feet. You knew if the fight was close, HOPKINS would claim robbery. The same way he did against TAYLOR. He won't give the honest assessment of what really happened. And that's sad. GOOD DAY.Comment
-
And that is what will happen if B-Hop wins. People should honor the contract as written.I'm on the fence on this one. Hopkins deserves the rematch more, but, Dawson is guaranteed next fight with Pascal. I don't want Hops to be another year older before he gets another shot, but I also would hate to see him stall out the division and avoid Bad Chad if he wins.
Comment
-
There could be trouble in store for Chad Dawson. According to WBC President Jose Sulaiman, nearly half of the votes of the WBC's 32-member Board of Governers are in favor of an immediate rematch between Bernard Hopkins and light heavyweight champion Jean Pascal, after which the winner would then meet Dawson.
[Click Here To Read More]
ha ha Pascal will want no part of Bhop again. I can see him giving up the belt and the WBC giving it to Hopkins.Comment

Comment