Manny pacquiao / Freddie roacch are hypocrites

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Needles
    Contender
    • Dec 2010
    • 103
    • 11
    • 0
    • 6,127

    #1

    Manny pacquiao / Freddie roacch are hypocrites

    Don't you find it odd that roach insisted team marg to undergo pre-fight testing last november, right in marg's locker room? Roach suspected marg might be cheating so he demands a drug test.. (who cares what margarito thinks right?)

    Now he is insisted testing leading up to the fight on may 7th against mosley. Obviously he is requesting EPO tests or what have you to deter cheating and protect manny pacquiao from a potential user. Mosley hasnt failed a drug test and has gone clean under comission testing.

    So manny pacquiao doesnt testing leading up to the fight but wants his to opponent to undergo testing he's ducked? let me tell you what, pac/roach and his team knows does know a thing or 2 about them PEDs and are being hypocrites other than being cheats
  • Needles
    Contender
    • Dec 2010
    • 103
    • 11
    • 0
    • 6,127

    #2
    There's much money invested in pacquiao right now, i wouldnt be surprised if his "comission" tests aren't exactly legitimate. Boxing would go down the ****ter if he is found dirty

    Comment

    • Stigma
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • May 2010
      • 232
      • 7
      • 1
      • 6,502

      #3
      Wasn't there an article where Roach debunked the testing request story? Which was published abroad in an English newspaper?

      And they wanted Margarito to take a test because of the materials they found in his locker room. He didn't know they would find that stuff there before the fight.

      Stop trolling.

      Comment

      • Weebler I
        El Weeblerito I
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 31113
        • 1,468
        • 1,648
        • 54,550

        #4
        You don't think the history of Margarito and Mosley warrants taking precautions? unlike Pacquiao, they hardly have clean records.

        Comment

        • DR.ORGYY
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 7318
          • 324
          • 100
          • 14,530

          #5
          ban this b.itch,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

          Comment

          • Pacquiao'd
            Banned
            • Mar 2010
            • 11948
            • 612
            • 153
            • 12,591

            #6
            shanr NEVER failed a test

            Comment

            • Stigma
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • May 2010
              • 232
              • 7
              • 1
              • 6,502

              #7
              Originally posted by yesir
              shanr NEVER failed a test
              Right. He only admitted to using.

              Comment

              • Visceral
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2010
                • 1169
                • 37
                • 37
                • 7,770

                #8
                Originally posted by The Weebler II
                You don't think the history of Margarito and Mosley warrants taking precautions? unlike Pacquiao, they hardly have clean records.
                This says everything.

                Comment

                • Needles
                  Contender
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 103
                  • 11
                  • 0
                  • 6,127

                  #9
                  Originally posted by The Weebler II
                  You don't think the history of Margarito and Mosley warrants taking precautions? unlike Pacquiao, they hardly have clean records.
                  so no one has the right to test pacquiao for PEDs because he has no history of using them? how do you suppose they catch cheats or potential cheats in the sport if the same testing protocol was in place as was for shane?

                  so okay, you're saying taking precautions against anyone really isnt warranted unless of course they have admitted or have been caught cheating. You might as well say, its okay to cheat just dont get caught using or admit to doing it

                  Comment

                  • Needles
                    Contender
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 103
                    • 11
                    • 0
                    • 6,127

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Stigma
                    Right. He only admitted to using.
                    if shane hadn't admitted to using he'd still be "clean" to the public eye

                    it would then theoretically put manny pacquiao at even more "risk" because he would never test shane because he has a clean history (pacfan logic)

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP