That is why he was adjudged as "The Great Disappointment"
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Mosley's Trainer: Shane Will Give Mayweather Jr. an Exit
Collapse
-
Naseem is indirectly justifying this match up. He has no choice but to say that. Remember this is the same guy who was on Floyd's jock during the fight with his fighter, mosley. He cant train a guy and say he may get his ass kicked. Its not to hard to read into it. The only things that can catch up to Floyd like most elite fighters, is age and going up to many weight divisions. Hes in better shape than anyone hes fought. He is always more accurate and has the best defense in the history of boxing. Not to mention he always controls the distance (minus Castillo I) and takes advantage of all bad habits and Manny has a few. There aint much left to master outside of punching power which isnt necessary to dominate.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EngorgedW/Blood View PostCome on seriously, if Pacquiao loses to an old shot Shane Mosley, who the fuck wants to see Mayweather fight Pacquiao, after Mayweather shut Mosley out like he did? I don't care about triangle theories and that's not where i'm getting at. It's like come on, you're going to fail at beating Floyd's leftovers but then you want a fight with Floyd?
Naz is stating the obvious, and every one is acting like he's owning Floyd or something. Of course Floyd shouldn't fight Pacquiao if he loses to Mosley. He cherry picked an old, shot, past prime Mosley and loses to him? How the hell will any one take Mayweather-Pacquiao serious if that happens? The first top African American fighter, who's not even slick or defensive, Pacquiao faces, he loses to him? That will just expose the truth that he's only good against slow handed come forward fighters.
Well IF Pacquaio loses to him, that is a big IF. Don't get too carried away for something that hasn't happened yet.
and IF Pacman beats Shane, then with your logic again, you should credit or discredit Pacman on how he beats Shane, if ever, since they BOTH faught an old, shot, past prime Mosley. If Pacman knocks out Shane, then that'l tell something just as how Pacman beat knocked out Hatton in 2 rounds whereas PBF took him way more to do so. Again, with your logic.
Comment
-
Answer
Originally posted by jlaz View Posthere's a question?? why is Pac getting all of Mayweather's leftovers???
Comment
-
Originally posted by Apple Mac View PostFor your answer,, who else would Pacquiao fight aside from them? Berto clearly doesn't have any interest to fight Pac when he was interviewed. Marquez? He's exposed as just wanting to have a big payday. C But all im wanting to see is Pac vs Floyd fight dont you agree and did that answered your question?
Comment
-
Originally posted by champ_kw View PostI'm confused by most of you guys logic. When Floyd beat Oscar, the crew of people Floyd "ducked" were Margarito, Cotto, and Paul Williams. I don't recall any of them being an undefeated 147 lb champ that could unify the belts like Berto is. I don't recall any of them being in two fights with Floyd and winning more rounds against him in the combined fights which resulted in a draw and a controversial win like Marquez is. So why is it Floyd "ducked" these guys who have done less to warrant a fight with Floyd than the current slate of fighters in Manny's path? I tell people all the time that this is a business. And it's only convenient for people to notice that when it's their favorite fighter in the driver's seat. The same "JMM and Berto or JMM and Khan could have fought so JMM can show and force Pacquiao to fight him as he would be a legitimate challenger if he did" logic you're using as reasoning to defend Pac's choice of opponent is the exact thing Floyd is being clowned for in the article. Thanks for showing how hypocritical "fan-dom" can be.
Comment
-
Originally posted by champ_kw View PostI'm confused by most of you guys logic. When Floyd beat Oscar, the crew of people Floyd "ducked" were Margarito, Cotto, and Paul Williams. I don't recall any of them being an undefeated 147 lb champ that could unify the belts like Berto is. I don't recall any of them being in two fights with Floyd and winning more rounds against him in the combined fights which resulted in a draw and a controversial win like Marquez is. So why is it Floyd "ducked" these guys who have done less to warrant a fight with Floyd than the current slate of fighters in Manny's path? I tell people all the time that this is a business. And it's only convenient for people to notice that when it's their favorite fighter in the driver's seat. The same "JMM and Berto or JMM and Khan could have fought so JMM can show and force Pacquiao to fight him as he would be a legitimate challenger if he did" logic you're using as reasoning to defend Pac's choice of opponent is the exact thing Floyd is being clowned for in the article. Thanks for showing how hypocritical "fan-dom" can be.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jlaz View Posthere's a question?? why is Pac getting all of Mayweather's leftovers???
wasn't gatti ward's leftovers? wasn't baldomir someone's left overs? wasn't mosley cotto's leftovers? wasn't judah baldomir's leftovers?
do us a favor and shove your foot in your mouth.
Comment
Comment