Comments Thread For: Froch vs Johnson: Glen 'I'll Adapt To Whatever Carl Does'

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rome-By-Ko
    The winner Is
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2009
    • 20157
    • 323
    • 332
    • 29,833

    #31
    Originally posted by Pu$$yKiller
    If a fight should be scored one way, even 1 round but it is given wrong then it is wrong and a roberry.

    Why is everyone on here accepting people doing their job wrong?

    If I need 70% in a test to get a job, 69% won't do.

    If I am suppose to get a refund for a certain amount, then I expect it.

    Judges get paid. So do it right.
    Everyone see's a fight different and scores it different..You said you thought Dirrell won against Froch and most likely felt he was robbed,I did not see it that way I felt the right man won the fight..A lot of people felt Froch beat Kessler(I was one of umm)but I did not feel that fight was a robbery,it was close and could have gone either way imo..

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #32
      Originally posted by romebyko
      Everyone see's a fight different and scores it different..You said you thought Dirrell won against Froch and most likely felt he was robbed,I did not see it that way I felt the right man won the fight..A lot of people felt Froch beat Kessler(I was one of umm)but I did not feel that fight was a robbery,it was close and could have gone either way imo..
      Dirrell didn't deserve to win against Froch IMO.

      Comment

      • Rome-By-Ko
        The winner Is
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 20157
        • 323
        • 332
        • 29,833

        #33
        Originally posted by Pu$$yKiller
        Whether or not he ran, and whined (Believe me I hate his high ptiched voice) he out landed Froch on clear scoring shots.

        Froch roughed him up, but missed a hell of a lot comapred to Dirrel IMO.
        Froch pushed the fight,while Dirrell held and hit and avoided for most of the fight..Everybody while watching a fight are looking for different things and that's why I was not giving Dirrell many rds early..

        Comment

        • Rome-By-Ko
          The winner Is
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 20157
          • 323
          • 332
          • 29,833

          #34
          Originally posted by IMDAZED
          Dirrell didn't deserve to win against Froch IMO.
          I did not feel he did enough to take a belt off a champion in his backyard or anywhere else for that matter..If he would have fought like he fought vs AA different story,but we have to understand Froch is not AA..Froch would have been in position to counter,that's why Dirrell was holding and hitting and avoiding..Every fight(imo)must be scored a lil different based on what each fighter brings to the table..

          Comment

          • Pu$$yKiller
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2010
            • 1011
            • 53
            • 11
            • 1,453

            #35
            Originally posted by IMDAZED
            I think Ward will have a very, very tough time with Froch but I think he wins as well, he's got too many facets too his game not too. And he matches Froch in the confidence department. This is going to be a great year for boxing.
            Yeah that's what I feel too. Dirrell has ducked Ward since 2006 or something. I recall his team said he wasn't ready, and then that brain ****... SMH. Respect to both though.

            Originally posted by romebyko
            Everyone see's a fight different and scores it different..You said you thought Dirrell won against Froch and most likely felt he was robbed,I did not see it that way I felt the right man won the fight..A lot of people felt Froch beat Kessler(I was one of umm)but I did not feel that fight was a robbery,it was close and could have gone either way imo..
            That's true it was a close fight. However when you break down a scorecard, it's a lot easier to justify your choice. Close rounds, but Kessler controlled him.

            * Kessler - Total Thrown: 765, Total Connects: 147 (19%)
            * Froch - Total Thrown: 546, Total Connects: 98 (18%)

            Ststs don't tell everthing indeed, but Kessler did more.

            Originally posted by IMDAZED
            Dirrell didn't deserve to win against Froch IMO.
            Maybe so, he ran and moaned, but IMO, he landed the cleaner and harder shots. Heck Dirrel got a point taken off while Froch got away with Rabbit punching.

            Comment

            • Rome-By-Ko
              The winner Is
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 20157
              • 323
              • 332
              • 29,833

              #36
              Originally posted by IMDAZED
              I think Ward will have a very, very tough time with Froch but I think he wins as well, he's got too many facets too his game not too. And he matches Froch in the confidence department. This is going to be a great year for boxing.
              I think once Ward fights away from home he will be exposed by Froch,that long jab of Froch will give Ward hella problems..

              Comment

              • Pu$$yKiller
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2010
                • 1011
                • 53
                • 11
                • 1,453

                #37
                Originally posted by romebyko
                Froch pushed the fight,while Dirrell held and hit and avoided for most of the fight..Everybody while watching a fight are looking for different things and that's why I was not giving Dirrell many rds early..
                I can understand that, but from the fight I saw, and judging on the shots that landed, Dirrell stunned Froch once and made him go to the ropes, and hit Froch with some good counters.

                I agree on your point about the champ as well, however I ahd Dirrel winning by 3 round or something. I forgot now though.

                Comment

                • CaRnAgEViOLaToR
                  VeNoM
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 1547
                  • 56
                  • 6
                  • 8,051

                  #38
                  I'm leaning towards Johnson by decision.....

                  Comment

                  • IMDAZED
                    Fair but Firm
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2006
                    • 42644
                    • 1,134
                    • 1,770
                    • 67,152

                    #39
                    Originally posted by romebyko
                    I did not feel he did enough to take a belt off a champion in his backyard or anywhere else for that matter..If he would have fought like he fought vs AA different story,but we have to understand Froch is not AA..Froch would have been in position to counter,that's why Dirrell was holding and hitting and avoiding..Every fight(imo)must be scored a lil different based on what each fighter brings to the table..
                    Agreed 100%.

                    Comment

                    • Rome-By-Ko
                      The winner Is
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 20157
                      • 323
                      • 332
                      • 29,833

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Pu$$yKiller
                      Yeah that's what I feel too. Dirrell has ducked Ward since 2006 or something. I recall his team said he wasn't ready, and then that brain ****... SMH. Respect to both though.



                      That's true it was a close fight. However when you break down a scorecard, it's a lot easier to justify your choice. Close rounds, but Kessler controlled him.

                      * Kessler - Total Thrown: 765, Total Connects: 147 (19%)
                      * Froch - Total Thrown: 546, Total Connects: 98 (18%)

                      Ststs don't tell everthing indeed, but Kessler did more.



                      Maybe so, he ran and moaned, but IMO, he landed the cleaner and harder shots. Heck Dirrel got a point taken off while Froch got away with Rabbit punching.
                      Froch was rabbit punching because of the tactic's Dirrell was using,he was not fighting straight up he was using tricks in order not to be hit and they were just as dirty as what Froch was doing..

                      In the Froch Kessler fight I saw one guy(Kessler)throwing alot of punches that was not hitting much,while the other guy(Froch)was landing the more effective damaging blows..That's just me I always compare that fight to Devon and Kottie(even tho not the robbery that fight was)Kottie imo landed the clean effective shots while Devon was busy..It's all about what ya like I guess..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP