How do you rank Barrera , Morales , Marquez and Hamed?
Collapse
-
-
And, Pac lost to an ATG in Morales no shame.
And, I assume you're talking about Pac lost to JMM? If so that is fine and that is your opinion. However, is there any shame in losing to JMM?
So idiotic, but I guess...Comment
-
lame.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Why is this thread being done over again? Morales and Barrera are both ranked over JMM, but they shouldn't be by much. And JMM was robbed worse against John than he was against Pacquiao and if that win had counted in his favor I think he should be ranked over Barrera and Morales no question. Look at how many title defenses John has made. That's why it's retarted to run down any of these three guys even if there's one you don't care for. I'm not really a Barrera fan but I give him credit for being a great fighter.Comment
-
What a sneaky and childish way to say "I hate Marquez", why don't you just come out and say it fatboy? I have no issue with people putting Morales and Barrera over Marquez, but when you're ranking a mediocre fighter like Naseem over a legend you're just just flat out hating.Comment
-
-
Marquez is the only one from that era still destroying fighters or even fighting at all. If I remember correctly they shut him out of those big fight for quite a few years. To place Hamed over him is awful.
1 Marquez
2 Barrera
3 Morales
4 HamedComment
Comment