What must a boxer do in order to raise PED su****ion?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • check hook
    Gay Pride
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 9361
    • 379
    • 137
    • 16,005

    #71
    Originally posted by puga
    did'nt see anything that says anything about bloodtesting....but here is one :

    Urine TKOs blood in Nevada boxing drug testing debate
    June 9, 9:32 PM

    The United States Anti Doping Agency sent the wrong guy to persuade the Nevada State Athletic Commission that completely random blood testing is a must for the huge Floyd Mayweather-Manny Pacquiao super bout.


    I listened to over three hours of testimony over a telephone hookup Wednesday presided over by NSAC Chairwoman Pat Lundvall and including the other four governor appointed members of the Silver State's boxing board.


    Travis Tygart, lawyer and publicity flack for the USADA, seemed to me to be a loser of a "split decision" to two speakers who preceded him, longtime Olympic boxing physician and Las Vegas resident Dr. Robert Voy and NSAC physician David Watson.

    Need to know "background" to all this is that the Nevada interests are still "frosted" that the blood testing arrangements for the May 1 Mayweather-Sugar Shane Mosley bout in Las Vegas were strictly a private, contractual matter btween two Golden Boy promoter fighters and did not involve the state boxing board in any manner or form. It's my understanding that only the always negative results and test dates were casually reported to Nevada.

    Can you say let;s go around the NSAC?


    The testimony of the two doctors, taken in whole and in part, favored totally random urine testing as the most practical and, more important, most efficient way of deterring Pacman, Mayweather and any other boxer who might seek to use banned substances in connection with a boxing match.

    Try as he might, and he was certainly quite glib, Tygart did not seem to persuade the commissioners that BOTH blood and urine random test must be put into effect for what Tygart kept repeating as "the protection for clean athletes."

    Nevada boxing commission Medical Chief, Dr. David Watson (Life Photo)


    If it was a battle between blood versus urine, I'd say urine was the winner but we'll have to see what the budget strained boxing board does next.

    Just thinking out loud, but the commission's less than overwhelming response to highly critical Tygart might be a reason for the Pacquiao side to push even harder for a Nov. 13 but, conversely, cause the Mayweather side to seek to delay the inevitable bout into next year.

    A fourth speaker was New Jersey boxing lawyer Patrick English who put in what came off as a suggestion that Nevada should enlist UCLA's highly respected Olympic drug expert, Dr. Donald Caitlin, to reform and/or expand its drug testing protocol. English did point out that that some experts are scientifcally uncomfortable because the USADA medical records have not been "published or peer reviewed."

    Certainly, inserting Dr. Caitlin into the Big Fight mix is a solid idea. Unlike Tygart, he doesn't come off as an advocate for Mayweather and an enemy of Pacquiao. He would be regarded as properly neutral and impartial as to both boxers.

    The banned susbtances most often mentioned were HGH and EPO.

    Voy, former Chief Medical Office of the USOC, said current blood testing as to HGH is "ureliable and impractical."

    He also said, "HGH is out there and there's not much we can do about it."

    As far as EPO testing, Voy said, "I'm of the opinion that EPO is not a performance enhancer in boxing or that it gives you more endurace although that is the perception."

    Regarding urine testing, Voy said it should be random and "closer to the event, the better."

    Voy also said that while tiny amounts of blood are drawn for testing "it can be dangerous."

    That was theme Dr. Watson chimed in on, saying, "I believe that urine is the best substance to test. I agree with Dr. Voy that urine (random testing) is what we should require and that blood is not necessary.

    "I agree with Dr. Voy that there are theoretical and real risks to blood testing one of which is a (boxer getting) a hematoma on the elbow or a clot from missing a vein. There are also HIV and Hepatitis C risks."

    Dr. Watson said blood testing should be curtailed "within three to four weeks before (a fight) so that the hemotoma risk does not put a fighter at a disadvantage."

    Dr. Watson even patted himself and the commission on their collective backs, saying, "We're doing a great job."

    Las Vegan Dr. Robert Voy is former Chief Medical Office of the United States Olmypic Committee

    Tygart could not agree less even to the point of some verbal sparring with Lundvall.

    She asked Tygart if blood testing is "the gold standard for everything."

    "You have to collect both," an exasperated Tygart said.

    Tygart defended his agency's not taking any blood from either Mayweather or opponent Shane Mosley after they had prefight tests 17 and 18 days before they May 1 bout. He said the boxers would be afraid to cheat because they know USADA could come knocking with their needles at any given time.

    Tygart took NSAC to task for expression concerns about blood testing expenses although this a climate where Gov. Jim Gibbons has been talking about closing down other state regulatory boards.

    He then made a financial suggestion which won't play well in the executive casino offices or with boxing promoters, saying taxes from casino revenues and PPV TV boxing could fund the testing completely.

    "You take one half of one percent of the PPV fees or some of the gaming revenues," Tygart said.

    Tygart made it clear, as he has in the past, that he thinks Nevada's testing regimen is a joke.

    "You can do a lot better for the clean athletes. No disrespect, frankly what you do (now) is inadequate. You guys deserve better, you can do better.

    "It's all about protecting the public, stopping the sportying fraud where athletes cheat to win and also protecting the health and safety of the athletes."

    Although it was noted that blood testing has caught merely one HGH cheater (a British rugby player) in eight years, Tygart said "in the next few months" a reliable blood test will be available which can nab HGH uses 14 to 21 days after usage.

    Tygart made the specious argument that some athletes prefer blood tests to giving urine.

    "Blood can be quicker and you don't have to drop your pants," Tygart said.

    His mantra was that only blood and urine, completely random testing will effectively police cheaters.

    "I think you have to have both to have an effective program."

    Tygart likes to shoot flaming arrows into the Nevada. Then he wonders why they circle their wagon train.

    Tygart mentioned he could have sent the WADA and USADA chief scientist before the boxing board and would be glad to present those officials in the future.

    Based on what I heard, the USADA's mistake was sending this prosecutor in the first place.

    Nevada offered up two doctors and USADA offered its legal beagle-PR chief.

    Now that's a mismatch.



    Urine is great if you bother to take it often and randomly, then bother to test it for things other than stock standard steroids.

    Still doesn't test for HGH though.

    Not to mention there is no storage of samples.

    Comment

    • puga
      rigo-go power rangers
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Sep 2010
      • 13980
      • 584
      • 568
      • 22,139

      #72
      Originally posted by check hook
      search deeper into why they come to that conclusion........it has nothing to do with PED's and the "DANGERS" of testing.

      If it was so practical and unnecessary why would the amatuer version of the sport do it if the pro's don't?? Why do many many sports do it?? Why do thousands upon thousands of Olympic athletes do it???

      To suggest it is impractical and unnecessary is complete and utter garbage. They do this everyday in other sports, and they still prosper.....not to mention these are non-contact sports.
      why dont you answer your own question since you think you know better than the commision doctors......please!

      Comment

      • check hook
        Gay Pride
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 9361
        • 379
        • 137
        • 16,005

        #73
        Originally posted by Alibata
        He agreed to 24 days then 2 weeks now he is saying all the way...Floyd ain't called him out on that yet. Pac has been wiling to compromise backed by Greenburg assertion that it is Floyd who is not making the fight. I don't see Haymon, who was part of the negotiations denying anything.. Ellerbe just denied that negotiations happened all together... Things that make you go hmmmmm.

        Sure, now......but when the fight was in danger of actually getting made he declined a two week cut-off......that can't be disputed.

        Comment

        • puga
          rigo-go power rangers
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Sep 2010
          • 13980
          • 584
          • 568
          • 22,139

          #74
          Originally posted by check hook
          Urine is great if you bother to take it often and randomly, then bother to test it for things other than stock standard steroids.

          Still doesn't test for HGH though.

          Not to mention there is no storage of samples.
          the doctors say bloodtsting does'nt detect hgh, none of the tests does...you a doctor?....

          Comment

          • IMDAZED
            Fair but Firm
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2006
            • 42644
            • 1,134
            • 1,770
            • 67,152

            #75
            Originally posted by puga
            did'nt see anything that says anything about bloodtesting....but here is one :

            Urine TKOs blood in Nevada boxing drug testing debate
            June 9, 9:32 PM

            The United States Anti Doping Agency sent the wrong guy to persuade the Nevada State Athletic Commission that completely random blood testing is a must for the huge Floyd Mayweather-Manny Pacquiao super bout.


            I listened to over three hours of testimony over a telephone hookup Wednesday presided over by NSAC Chairwoman Pat Lundvall and including the other four governor appointed members of the Silver State's boxing board.


            Travis Tygart, lawyer and publicity flack for the USADA, seemed to me to be a loser of a "split decision" to two speakers who preceded him, longtime Olympic boxing physician and Las Vegas resident Dr. Robert Voy and NSAC physician David Watson.

            Need to know "background" to all this is that the Nevada interests are still "frosted" that the blood testing arrangements for the May 1 Mayweather-Sugar Shane Mosley bout in Las Vegas were strictly a private, contractual matter btween two Golden Boy promoter fighters and did not involve the state boxing board in any manner or form. It's my understanding that only the always negative results and test dates were casually reported to Nevada.

            Can you say let;s go around the NSAC?


            The testimony of the two doctors, taken in whole and in part, favored totally random urine testing as the most practical and, more important, most efficient way of deterring Pacman, Mayweather and any other boxer who might seek to use banned substances in connection with a boxing match.

            Try as he might, and he was certainly quite glib, Tygart did not seem to persuade the commissioners that BOTH blood and urine random test must be put into effect for what Tygart kept repeating as "the protection for clean athletes."

            Nevada boxing commission Medical Chief, Dr. David Watson (Life Photo)


            If it was a battle between blood versus urine, I'd say urine was the winner but we'll have to see what the budget strained boxing board does next.

            Just thinking out loud, but the commission's less than overwhelming response to highly critical Tygart might be a reason for the Pacquiao side to push even harder for a Nov. 13 but, conversely, cause the Mayweather side to seek to delay the inevitable bout into next year.

            A fourth speaker was New Jersey boxing lawyer Patrick English who put in what came off as a suggestion that Nevada should enlist UCLA's highly respected Olympic drug expert, Dr. Donald Caitlin, to reform and/or expand its drug testing protocol. English did point out that that some experts are scientifcally uncomfortable because the USADA medical records have not been "published or peer reviewed."

            Certainly, inserting Dr. Caitlin into the Big Fight mix is a solid idea. Unlike Tygart, he doesn't come off as an advocate for Mayweather and an enemy of Pacquiao. He would be regarded as properly neutral and impartial as to both boxers.

            The banned susbtances most often mentioned were HGH and EPO.

            Voy, former Chief Medical Office of the USOC, said current blood testing as to HGH is "ureliable and impractical."

            He also said, "HGH is out there and there's not much we can do about it."

            As far as EPO testing, Voy said, "I'm of the opinion that EPO is not a performance enhancer in boxing or that it gives you more endurace although that is the perception."

            Regarding urine testing, Voy said it should be random and "closer to the event, the better."

            Voy also said that while tiny amounts of blood are drawn for testing "it can be dangerous."

            That was theme Dr. Watson chimed in on, saying, "I believe that urine is the best substance to test. I agree with Dr. Voy that urine (random testing) is what we should require and that blood is not necessary.

            "I agree with Dr. Voy that there are theoretical and real risks to blood testing one of which is a (boxer getting) a hematoma on the elbow or a clot from missing a vein. There are also HIV and Hepatitis C risks."

            Dr. Watson said blood testing should be curtailed "within three to four weeks before (a fight) so that the hemotoma risk does not put a fighter at a disadvantage."

            Dr. Watson even patted himself and the commission on their collective backs, saying, "We're doing a great job."

            Las Vegan Dr. Robert Voy is former Chief Medical Office of the United States Olmypic Committee

            Tygart could not agree less even to the point of some verbal sparring with Lundvall.

            She asked Tygart if blood testing is "the gold standard for everything."

            "You have to collect both," an exasperated Tygart said.

            Tygart defended his agency's not taking any blood from either Mayweather or opponent Shane Mosley after they had prefight tests 17 and 18 days before they May 1 bout. He said the boxers would be afraid to cheat because they know USADA could come knocking with their needles at any given time.

            Tygart took NSAC to task for expression concerns about blood testing expenses although this a climate where Gov. Jim Gibbons has been talking about closing down other state regulatory boards.

            He then made a financial suggestion which won't play well in the executive casino offices or with boxing promoters, saying taxes from casino revenues and PPV TV boxing could fund the testing completely.

            "You take one half of one percent of the PPV fees or some of the gaming revenues," Tygart said.

            Tygart made it clear, as he has in the past, that he thinks Nevada's testing regimen is a joke.

            "You can do a lot better for the clean athletes. No disrespect, frankly what you do (now) is inadequate. You guys deserve better, you can do better.

            "It's all about protecting the public, stopping the sportying fraud where athletes cheat to win and also protecting the health and safety of the athletes."

            Although it was noted that blood testing has caught merely one HGH cheater (a British rugby player) in eight years, Tygart said "in the next few months" a reliable blood test will be available which can nab HGH uses 14 to 21 days after usage.

            Tygart made the specious argument that some athletes prefer blood tests to giving urine.

            "Blood can be quicker and you don't have to drop your pants," Tygart said.

            His mantra was that only blood and urine, completely random testing will effectively police cheaters.

            "I think you have to have both to have an effective program."

            Tygart likes to shoot flaming arrows into the Nevada. Then he wonders why they circle their wagon train.

            Tygart mentioned he could have sent the WADA and USADA chief scientist before the boxing board and would be glad to present those officials in the future.

            Based on what I heard, the USADA's mistake was sending this prosecutor in the first place.

            Nevada offered up two doctors and USADA offered its legal beagle-PR chief.

            Now that's a mismatch.
            So..you brought up an article underscoring your point about the NSAC.

            That's nice. Too bad the STATE's medical head and scores of international doctors disagree.

            Comment

            • Wapacman
              Banned
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Dec 2010
              • 550
              • 45
              • 24
              • 716

              #76
              Originally posted by puga
              commision doctors say its unnecessary to have blood testng for drugs , do you know more than them,are you a doctor?......
              Thats because the commision docters are full of sh@$

              Comment

              • Alibata
                Dugong Maharlika
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2004
                • 9047
                • 280
                • 33
                • 16,053

                #77
                Originally posted by check hook
                Sure, now......but when the fight was in danger of actually getting made he declined a two week cut-off......that can't be disputed.
                Negotiating is a process that hopefully leads to an agreement. It is an ongoing process.. we have one side seemingly there and the other on vacation. Floyd won, Pac caved on his demand but where is floyd now?. The ball is on his court... That is what is out there that most agree on. This is why the world thinks Floyd is ducking. If floyd has any doubts, pac has put it out there in his own words quote for quote (look at my sig). He has said it in several interviews now that he is willing to submit to floyd's demands, in his own words. why doesn't floyd call him out on it... If he just picked up the phone and called arum or when arum calls.
                Last edited by Alibata; 12-29-2010, 02:21 AM.

                Comment

                • check hook
                  Gay Pride
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 9361
                  • 379
                  • 137
                  • 16,005

                  #78
                  Originally posted by puga
                  why dont you answer your own question since you think you know better than the commision doctors......please!


                  The NSAC like all other state commissions has a vested interest in lax drug testing. They looked into the benefits of upgrading their testing and decided their inferior status quo was adequate.

                  Dr Don Caitlin (look him up), Victor Conte and the heads of USADA and WADA are the most recognisded authorities on anti-doping. Not to mention the former NSAC medical advisory board head Dr Margaret Goodman has berated the NSAC current procedures.........

                  So which commission doctors rejected it??? Names please?? I want to see if they have any credentials in the field of PED's......like Caitlin, Conte, USADA, WADA etc etc.....??? Was the decision to adopt a better standard left up to them, or was a vote taken by the NSAC board/members?????

                  Comment

                  • check hook
                    Gay Pride
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 9361
                    • 379
                    • 137
                    • 16,005

                    #79
                    Originally posted by puga
                    the doctors say bloodtsting does'nt detect hgh, none of the tests does...you a doctor?....


                    Actually blood testing has been confirmed as the only known weay to detect HGH. A rugby player in England tested positive.

                    Comment

                    • Wapacman
                      Banned
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Dec 2010
                      • 550
                      • 45
                      • 24
                      • 716

                      #80
                      Originally posted by puga
                      the doctors say bloodtsting does'nt detect hgh, none of the tests does...you a doctor?....
                      Not true puga. there are now blood tests for HGH.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP