Haye is just a CW, remember that.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pirao
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 3867
    • 131
    • 439
    • 10,171

    #11
    Originally posted by BattleHardened
    Blown up CW, small, small HW. If Klits win, it does nothing for the pathetic legacy of theirs.
    Well it would mean Wlad doesn't lose to a blown up CW, unlike Mike Tyson

    Comment

    • jrosales13
      undisputed champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 32632
      • 739
      • 763
      • 40,023

      #12
      Originally posted by -Tunney-
      David Haye is a natural heavyweight, unlike Adamek who's a natural cruiserweight.

      Haye is about the same size as Muhammed Ali. He said he HAD to move up because he was "killing himself" to make cruiserweight.

      Adamek had no problems making cruiserweight, although to make light heavyweight at the end of his stay there he needed to weight-drain (that's why he lost to Dawson). He moved up tp HW for better paydays.
      Of FFS's

      Comment

      • Bastian Loc
        schweinsteiger innit?
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Sep 2010
        • 10027
        • 334
        • 180
        • 17,886

        #13
        Originally posted by jrosales13
        Of FFS's

        Its true, that's why he lost to Dawson. If Dawson jumped up to cw or hw, Adamek would destroy him.

        Comment

        • jrosales13
          undisputed champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 32632
          • 739
          • 763
          • 40,023

          #14
          Originally posted by Subtraction
          Its true, that's why he lost to Dawson. If Dawson jumped up to cw or hw, Adamek would destroy him.
          If JMM jumped to WW, Pac would destroy him. WTF is your point?

          That is not the reason he lost to Dawson at LHW.

          Comment

          • Check
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2008
            • 16585
            • 677
            • 132
            • 26,287

            #15
            Europeans can do no wrong in Tunney or Jacks mind. Adamek lost because Dawson is a more skillful fighter, faster, and just overall better ring iq. Adamek really isn't that good. I'd favor an overrated Haye, Chambers, and of course the Klitchkos all over Adamek. Dude was never the best at light heavy, had he had the nuts he would of lost in the rematch to Cunningham at CW, and at Heavy he is nothing. No matter what weight he is fighting at he is gonna lose to the best, so quit with this weight drained ****.

            Comment

            • Bastian Loc
              schweinsteiger innit?
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Sep 2010
              • 10027
              • 334
              • 180
              • 17,886

              #16
              Originally posted by jrosales13
              If JMM jumped to WW, Pac would destroy him. WTF is your point?

              That is not the reason he lost to Dawson at LHW.
              No he wouldn't.

              And yes it is.

              The point is, Adamek lost because he was wasting training camps just trying to make weight.

              Pendejo.

              Comment

              • Pirao
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 3867
                • 131
                • 439
                • 10,171

                #17
                Originally posted by Check
                Europeans can do no wrong in Tunney or Jacks mind. Adamek lost because Dawson is a more skillful fighter, faster, and just overall better ring iq. Adamek really isn't that good. I'd favor an overrated Haye, Chambers, and of course the Klitchkos all over Adamek. Dude was never the best at light heavy, had he had the nuts he would of lost in the rematch to Cunningham at CW, and at Heavy he is nothing. No matter what weight he is fighting at he is gonna lose to the best, so quit with this weight drained ****.
                Yeah we can all see that you're an unbiased and level headed poster

                Comment

                • Bastian Loc
                  schweinsteiger innit?
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 10027
                  • 334
                  • 180
                  • 17,886

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Check
                  Europeans can do no wrong in Tunney or Jacks mind. Adamek lost because Dawson is a more skillful fighter, faster, and just overall better ring iq. Adamek really isn't that good. I'd favor an overrated Haye, Chambers, and of course the Klitchkos all over Adamek. Dude was never the best at light heavy, had he had the nuts he would of lost in the rematch to Cunningham at CW, and at Heavy he is nothing. No matter what weight he is fighting at he is gonna lose to the best, so quit with this weight drained ****.
                  Dawson got exposed by a guy most people call a bum (Pascal) yet he's this great fighter.



                  All myth bro.

                  As for Cunningham, I love how you're living in some fantasy world where he would've won a rematch clearly ignoring that Adamek mopped the ring floor with him in the first fight dropping him every other round.


                  I live in the real world. Not in the fantasy world of Dawson's mythical "potential" and Cunningham's rematch victories.

                  Comment

                  • Check
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 16585
                    • 677
                    • 132
                    • 26,287

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Pirao
                    Yeah we can all see that you're an unbiased and level headed poster
                    It's true, he would lose to USS Cunningham in a rematch. He had to knock him down like what, 3 times to get a SD.

                    Comment

                    • jrosales13
                      undisputed champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Sep 2008
                      • 32632
                      • 739
                      • 763
                      • 40,023

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Check
                      Europeans can do no wrong in Tunney or Jacks mind. Adamek lost because Dawson is a more skillful fighter, faster, and just overall better ring iq. Adamek really isn't that good. I'd favor an overrated Haye, Chambers, and of course the Klitchkos all over Adamek. Dude was never the best at light heavy, had he had the nuts he would of lost in the rematch to Cunningham at CW, and at Heavy he is nothing. No matter what weight he is fighting at he is gonna lose to the best, so quit with this weight drained ****.
                      GTFOH, yes he is...

                      Klitschko's could beat him of course cuz they just too damn big for him.

                      Haye? I'm not sure, I think that is a 50/50 fight. I would love to see it.

                      Chambers? I think another good fight but I would favor Adamek in that one.

                      You don't know if he would of lost in the rematch with Cunningham...And, if Cunningham wouldn't suffer that JMM syndrome he probably would of won the first fight. However, Adamek put him in the canvas and there is no reason why he couldn't do it again on a rematch.

                      Yes Adamek is pretty damn good, He is somewhere in the top 10-15 P4P fighters.

                      But, I agree they should quit the weight drained shit. Dawson was just the better fighter that night. And, Dawson is pretty damn skilled fighter.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP