Haye is just a CW, remember that.
Collapse
-
Of FFS'sDavid Haye is a natural heavyweight, unlike Adamek who's a natural cruiserweight.
Haye is about the same size as Muhammed Ali. He said he HAD to move up because he was "killing himself" to make cruiserweight.
Adamek had no problems making cruiserweight, although to make light heavyweight at the end of his stay there he needed to weight-drain (that's why he lost to Dawson). He moved up tp HW for better paydays.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-

Europeans can do no wrong in Tunney or Jacks mind. Adamek lost because Dawson is a more skillful fighter, faster, and just overall better ring iq. Adamek really isn't that good. I'd favor an overrated Haye, Chambers, and of course the Klitchkos all over Adamek. Dude was never the best at light heavy, had he had the nuts he would of lost in the rematch to Cunningham at CW, and at Heavy he is nothing. No matter what weight he is fighting at he is gonna lose to the best, so quit with this weight drained ****.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Yeah we can all see that you're an unbiased and level headed poster
Europeans can do no wrong in Tunney or Jacks mind. Adamek lost because Dawson is a more skillful fighter, faster, and just overall better ring iq. Adamek really isn't that good. I'd favor an overrated Haye, Chambers, and of course the Klitchkos all over Adamek. Dude was never the best at light heavy, had he had the nuts he would of lost in the rematch to Cunningham at CW, and at Heavy he is nothing. No matter what weight he is fighting at he is gonna lose to the best, so quit with this weight drained ****.
Comment
-
Dawson got exposed by a guy most people call a bum (Pascal) yet he's this great fighter.
Europeans can do no wrong in Tunney or Jacks mind. Adamek lost because Dawson is a more skillful fighter, faster, and just overall better ring iq. Adamek really isn't that good. I'd favor an overrated Haye, Chambers, and of course the Klitchkos all over Adamek. Dude was never the best at light heavy, had he had the nuts he would of lost in the rematch to Cunningham at CW, and at Heavy he is nothing. No matter what weight he is fighting at he is gonna lose to the best, so quit with this weight drained ****.

All myth bro.
As for Cunningham, I love how you're living in some fantasy world where he would've won a rematch clearly ignoring that Adamek mopped the ring floor with him in the first fight dropping him every other round.
I live in the real world. Not in the fantasy world of Dawson's mythical "potential" and Cunningham's rematch victories.
Comment
-
GTFOH, yes he is...
Europeans can do no wrong in Tunney or Jacks mind. Adamek lost because Dawson is a more skillful fighter, faster, and just overall better ring iq. Adamek really isn't that good. I'd favor an overrated Haye, Chambers, and of course the Klitchkos all over Adamek. Dude was never the best at light heavy, had he had the nuts he would of lost in the rematch to Cunningham at CW, and at Heavy he is nothing. No matter what weight he is fighting at he is gonna lose to the best, so quit with this weight drained ****.
Klitschko's could beat him of course cuz they just too damn big for him.
Haye? I'm not sure, I think that is a 50/50 fight. I would love to see it.
Chambers? I think another good fight but I would favor Adamek in that one.
You don't know if he would of lost in the rematch with Cunningham...And, if Cunningham wouldn't suffer that JMM syndrome he probably would of won the first fight. However, Adamek put him in the canvas and there is no reason why he couldn't do it again on a rematch.
Yes Adamek is pretty damn good, He is somewhere in the top 10-15 P4P fighters.
But, I agree they should quit the weight drained shit. Dawson was just the better fighter that night. And, Dawson is pretty damn skilled fighter.Comment
Comment