130 Manny vs 144 Manny, who wins & why?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cixthree
    I love Manny Pacquaio
    • Nov 2008
    • 2221
    • 152
    • 0
    • 8,387

    #1

    130 Manny vs 144 Manny, who wins & why?

    130 Manny will for sure come into the fight weighing around 140/142, 144 Manny will come in around 147/148 so weight is not a problem.

    130 Manny will be faster, as strong and have way more stamina than the bigger slower Manny.
    Both guys can take whatever the other gives, as far as punishment goes, it's more about who lands first from how I see it.

    For those who say 144 Manny is more improved than 130 Manny, Mannys been pro for 15 years. He's been fighting the same way (with some improvments, using the right more, basic footwork but that's pretty much it) for the last 8/9 years since under Freddy.

    When you've done something for so long, it's hard to just change it. You are what you are, and even with improvments you're only as improved by how many years (It's only been 2 years, and out of 15 years pro we finally see the right and some footwork?) you've been improving.

    I don't see the 144 Manny being able to handle the smaller Manny, just to fast, strong and durable....

    Who you got, and why..
  • PrinceCharlez
    Undisputed Champion
    • Jun 2010
    • 1228
    • 114
    • 0
    • 7,372

    #2
    Originally posted by cixthree
    130 Manny will for sure come into the fight weighing around 140/142, 144 Manny will come in around 147/148 so weight is not a problem.

    130 Manny will be faster, as strong and have way more stamina than the bigger slower Manny.
    Both guys can take whatever the other gives, as far as punishment goes, it's more about who lands first from how I see it.

    For those who say 144 Manny is more improved than 130 Manny, Mannys been pro for 15 years. He's been fighting the same way (with some improvments, using the right more, basic footwork but that's pretty much it) for the last 8/9 years since under Freddy.

    When you've done something for so long, it's hard to just change it. You are what you are, and even with improvments you're only as improved by how many years (It's only been 2 years, and out of 15 years pro we finally see the right and some footwork?) you've been improving.

    I don't see the 144 Manny being able to handle the smaller Manny, just to fast, strong and durable....

    Who you got, and why..
    actually the 130 Manny wont come into the ring 12 to 14 lbs heavier, he has never done that before. But the 147 Manny would win because he would be faster, stronger, and take punches from guys who are JMW. The Manny at 130 didnt have no stamina, power in his right had, nor could he take a punch, marquez and erik was knocking his d!ck loose from time to time. With 17 additional lbs (from 130-147) he's leaner, meaner, and full of peds...
    Last edited by PrinceCharlez; 12-24-2010, 01:12 PM.

    Comment

    • J.Dempsey
      Boards...don't hit back!
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 1618
      • 113
      • 154
      • 9,166

      #3
      144 manny, he uses more angles than the older version...n ofcourse theres more power with the additional pounds..

      now 130 JMM vs. 144 manny...that b a better fight

      Comment

      • jrosales13
        undisputed champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 32632
        • 739
        • 763
        • 40,023

        #4
        Originally posted by PrinceCharlez
        actually the 130 Manny wont come into the ring 12 to 14 lbs heavier, he has never done that before. But the 147 Manny would win because he would be faster, stronger, and take punches from guys who are JMW. The Manny at 130 didnt have no stamina, power in his right had, nor could he take a punch, marquez and erik was knocking his d!ck loose from time to time. With 17 additional lbs (from 130-147) he's leaner, meaner, and full of peds...
        So you started watching boxing in 2007 and then found out who Pac was in Dec of 2008?

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP