guys floyd should've fought but didn't....
Collapse
-
not saying they would've beaten floyd, or that there weren't obstacles to making said fights, but these are some guys floyd should've fought but didn't. feel free to add you own.
at 130 lbs: freitas, casamayor
at 135 lbs: spadafora
at 140 lbs: harris, hatton, cotto, tszyu, mitchell
at 147 lbs: cotto, margarito, berto, pwill,
BTW, all fighters have a "Guys they shoulda fought, but did'nt" list....Comment
-
Marg at the time could not offer any of that, if so what?
1. He had no belt.
2. Who was he at the time, Baldiu had just beaten Zab. So more people knew of Baldi from beating Zab, than people who even knew who Margs was at the time.
3. The money was there on both ends, but what came with more perks?
You have to had been a fan of the entire sport to really understand what was going on dude.. that's why it gets annoying when guys who have only been following boxing for a few years say this kinda shyt.
Speak on what you know, rather than what you've been convinced of by a hater....
If you only know one aspect of the sport, speak only on that. If it's the last 2/3 years, stick to only that.Comment
-
not saying they would've beaten floyd, or that there weren't obstacles to making said fights, but these are some guys floyd should've fought but didn't. feel free to add you own.
at 130 lbs: freitas, casamayor
at 135 lbs: spadafora
at 140 lbs: harris, hatton, cotto, tszyu, mitchell
at 147 lbs: cotto, margarito, berto, pwill,Comment
-
floyd was #1 p4p what was margarito?who did margarito beat? the only fight that probably should have been made was the cotto fight, margarito had done nothing to deserve a fight with the best boxer in the world he never even beat the best in his divisionComment
-
-
At the time, Floyd was fighting for attention, belts and money.
Marg at the time could not offer any of that, if so what?
1. He had no belt.
2. Who was he at the time, Baldiu had just beaten Zab. So more people knew of Baldi from beating Zab, than people who even knew who Margs was at the time.
3. The money was there on both ends, but what came with more perks?
You have to had been a fan of the entire sport to really understand what was going on dude.. that's why it gets annoying when guys who have only been following boxing for a few years say this kinda shyt.
Speak on what you know, rather than what you've been convinced of by a hater....
If you only know one aspect of the sport, speak only on that. If it's the last 2/3 years, stick to only that.
Were you even watching boxing back then? Or did you start following boxing after Floyd vs the big show?Comment
Comment