Tweet
CALIFORNIA TO REVIEW BOXING & MMA JUDGES!
December 20th, 2010 By Pedro Fernandez
DODD SAYS JUDGES WHO ARE OFF WILL BE OFFED!
San Francisco, CA- Had a short conversation yesterday with George Dodd, the man who runs the California State Athletic Commission. My reason in calling was to inquire about an item I read in Dave Meltzer’s Wrestling Observer Newsletter, that the commission will now be reviewing the scorecards of all judges. Mr. Dodd confirmed such and said he thinks the process can only improve judging overall, something people have been clamoring for for years. Accountability for judging, Dodd seems to have found his footing on this issue.
PUTTING JUDGES ON NOTICE IS GREAT, HOW ABOUT YEARLY EYE EXAMS?
Having broached this subject with past Executive Officers of the California Commission, I was pleasantly surprised at Dodd’s move. For years, a couple of LA based judges in particular, they seemingly had the “house” fighter “closer” or winning when the other two jurists didn’t! This process will enable Dodd to weed out the judges that can make a night at the fights suck to the point where you walk away saying to yourself, “Who should I believe, those judges, or my lying eyes?”
DODD THINKING HARD ON YEARLY EYE EXAMS
While discussing the judging review, I asked Dodd if any of his judges take eye exams? He answered to the negative, and I pointed out that people as they age, their vision can change dramatically in two years. I mean, I’ve been ringside and I’ve watched judges squinting for the entire three minute session of battle. He mentioned that referees have to pass an annual physical, but judges don’t. I asked how extensive the referee’s eye exam is, and Dodd said it was part of a regular physical, which means the old “E” eye chart from ten feet away is the extent of the optical examinations. In closing, Dodd agreed with me on the need for annual eye exams, this before I wished him Happy Holidays!
December 20th, 2010 By Pedro Fernandez
DODD SAYS JUDGES WHO ARE OFF WILL BE OFFED!
San Francisco, CA- Had a short conversation yesterday with George Dodd, the man who runs the California State Athletic Commission. My reason in calling was to inquire about an item I read in Dave Meltzer’s Wrestling Observer Newsletter, that the commission will now be reviewing the scorecards of all judges. Mr. Dodd confirmed such and said he thinks the process can only improve judging overall, something people have been clamoring for for years. Accountability for judging, Dodd seems to have found his footing on this issue.
PUTTING JUDGES ON NOTICE IS GREAT, HOW ABOUT YEARLY EYE EXAMS?
Having broached this subject with past Executive Officers of the California Commission, I was pleasantly surprised at Dodd’s move. For years, a couple of LA based judges in particular, they seemingly had the “house” fighter “closer” or winning when the other two jurists didn’t! This process will enable Dodd to weed out the judges that can make a night at the fights suck to the point where you walk away saying to yourself, “Who should I believe, those judges, or my lying eyes?”
DODD THINKING HARD ON YEARLY EYE EXAMS
While discussing the judging review, I asked Dodd if any of his judges take eye exams? He answered to the negative, and I pointed out that people as they age, their vision can change dramatically in two years. I mean, I’ve been ringside and I’ve watched judges squinting for the entire three minute session of battle. He mentioned that referees have to pass an annual physical, but judges don’t. I asked how extensive the referee’s eye exam is, and Dodd said it was part of a regular physical, which means the old “E” eye chart from ten feet away is the extent of the optical examinations. In closing, Dodd agreed with me on the need for annual eye exams, this before I wished him Happy Holidays!
Comment