Originally posted by RL_GMA
View Post
A legacy is determined by who you fought, and when you fought them.
But the weight and fight terms will also be a factor, as will the following.....
* Manny will not fight a skilled boxer
* Manny will not fight a skilled counter-puncher
* Manny will not fight anybody who is in their prime
* Manny will not fight anybody who is coming off a win
* Manny will not fight anybody who is on top of their game
* Manny will not fight anybody without a distinct advantage
* And at JMW, Manny will not fight anybody at all
Also, two more things will be heavily factored in when weighing up Pac's legacy.....
1.) There are question marks over EVERY SINGLE PACQUIAO FIGHT dating back to before Morales
2.) the freakish weight gain, 15lbs of muscle in less than 18 months, and then subsequent refusal to submit to random blood testing

Only Manny-fan's are being fooled, real boxing fan's can see what's up.
Read this thread if you don't believe me

http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&id=34061
Originally posted by RL_GMA
View Post
Otherwise you wouldn't have written the first paragraph that I quoted above.
Nobody, get this..... NOBODY, gives SRL any credit for Lalonde.
They don't need to, because Ray had ALREADY cemented his legacy WELL BEFORE THEN, by taking on great fighters who were in their prime.
Whereas Pacquiao's legacy is almost completely made up of Lalonde's.
EVERY SINGLE FIGHT dating back to Morales has question marks.
Catch-weights, shop-worn opponents, exhibition match's passed off as title fights, lucky decisons, OST issues, bizarre occurences both in and out of the ring, in house match-ups, and the list goes on, and on.....
And the point is.....
2.) the freakish weight gain, 15lbs of muscle in less than 18 months, and then subsequent refusal to submit to random blood testing

Not only is his legacy highly questionable, but it is likely fraudulent as well.
It is a joke that you compared Pacquiao to Leonard.
Comment