Reminds me of JMM AND Pac fight 1

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Pu$$yKiller
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2010
    • 1011
    • 53
    • 11
    • 1,453

    #1

    Reminds me of JMM AND Pac fight 1

    Pac did the early work and started getting boxed.

    However Pac won some rounds because some rounds were very close, when you get dropped a lot, you really need to win extra big in every round.

    Hopkins dominated a lot of rounds for sure, but Pascal won maybe 2.

    It was like 4am so I didn;t bother scoring, and did feel Hopkins won, but that's also psychological because Hopkins seemd to win mroe rounds, but thinking about it, KD's are KD's.

    Same with Pac and JMM, I forgot it now but I didn't have it for JMM even though he won most rounds, the KD's affected it. I forgot my scoring then too.
  • Chups
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2004
    • 18400
    • 1,835
    • 1,281
    • 52,879

    #2
    Had the knockdowns been real and not slips.....we would not be feeling so much a robbery for Hopkins.

    Comment

    • led
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2010
      • 7933
      • 2,306
      • 2,762
      • 30,375

      #3
      Originally posted by Pu$$yKiller
      Pac did the early work and started getting boxed.

      However Pac won some rounds because some rounds were very close, when you get dropped a lot, you really need to win extra big in every round.

      Hopkins dominated a lot of rounds for sure, but Pascal won maybe 2.

      It was like 4am so I didn;t bother scoring, and did feel Hopkins won, but that's also psychological because Hopkins seemd to win mroe rounds, but thinking about it, KD's are KD's.

      Same with Pac and JMM, I forgot it now but I didn't have it for JMM even though he won most rounds, the KD's affected it. I forgot my scoring then too.
      this is why i never participate in any thread that hopkins is robbed. hopkins did very good. however, the points in early round gave pascal an edge. we just cant say that hopkins really dominated the rest of the rounds. judges can have a different view/angle for them to have a different score from what we have--the audience.

      Comment

      • Pu$$yKiller
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2010
        • 1011
        • 53
        • 11
        • 1,453

        #4
        I had a stream and to me, Hopkins looked like he got physically moved from the shots and slipped.

        I still feel Hopkins won, but it can not be a roberry. Champions are more likely to win close rounds.

        I may change my mind with a good video.

        Comment

        • led
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 7933
          • 2,306
          • 2,762
          • 30,375

          #5
          Originally posted by Pu$$yKiller
          I had a stream and to me, Hopkins looked like he got physically moved from the shots and slipped.

          I still feel Hopkins won, but it can not be a roberry. Champions are more likely to win close rounds.

          I may change my mind with a good video.
          i agree. i feel that hopkins won. but as you say it cannot be called a robbery.

          Comment

          • BoxingTech718
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 4646
            • 300
            • 217
            • 25,563

            #6
            The first KD was not one, it was a push on the back of the head. This was a hometown gift if I ever saw one before. There is something wrong if you can escape with a draw after losing 8 rounds out of 12.

            Comment

            • SplitSecond
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 23151
              • 1,715
              • 1,187
              • 85,044

              #7
              Originally posted by Chups
              Had the knockdowns been real and not slips.....we would not be feeling so much a robbery for Hopkins.
              what are you on about chups? the KD's were legit in hop-pascal

              he slipped? lol, he fell like a sack of potatoes while just standing there, not like he misplaced his foot

              Comment

              • Tyson.
                Banned
                • Jul 2010
                • 801
                • 116
                • 31
                • 969

                #8
                Pacquiao was way more competitive with JMM than Pascal with B-hop.

                The KDs Pac scored were also legit. Pascal didnt win any round comfortably. The 1st round was a bogus KD, and B-hop should of won it 10-9. Round 3 was a legit KD by Pascal but he still lost the round so it should of only been 10-9 for B-hop.

                Pac Vs JMM was a close fight, B-hop was robbed.

                Comment

                • Pu$$yKiller
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 1011
                  • 53
                  • 11
                  • 1,453

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Morales.
                  Pacquiao was way more competitive with JMM than Pascal with B-hop.

                  The KDs Pac scored were also legit. Pascal didnt win any round comfortably. The 1st round was a bogus KD, and B-hop should of won it 10-9. Round 3 was a legit KD by Pascal but he still lost the round so it should of only been 10-9 for B-hop.

                  Pac Vs JMM was a close fight, B-hop was robbed.
                  Erm whether it is legit or not, the ref called it. So we have to take it as that.

                  Heck he prevented to KD's aswell.

                  Yes Pac and JMM was more clsoer for sure, but Pascal had atleast 2 close rounds after the 5th. I forgot them, but if he was given them then I can see why it was closer than we thought.

                  Manny SAteward calls them comaprative rouns where in a close fight, you may give a round to the fighter who has lsot a few rounds.

                  Also pascal is the cahmp so you really gotta take it away from him sometimes too.

                  Comment

                  • Tyson.
                    Banned
                    • Jul 2010
                    • 801
                    • 116
                    • 31
                    • 969

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Pu$$yKiller
                    Erm whether it is legit or not, the ref called it. So we have to take it as that.

                    Heck he prevented to KD's aswell.

                    Yes Pac and JMM was more clsoer for sure, but Pascal had atleast 2 close rounds after the 5th. I forgot them, but if he was given them then I can see why it was closer than we thought.

                    Manny SAteward calls them comaprative rouns where in a close fight, you may give a round to the fighter who has lsot a few rounds.

                    Also pascal is the cahmp so you really gotta take it away from him sometimes too.
                    No Pascal didnt have any round after the 3rd. Pascal only really deserved a 10-9 round in the 3rd despite scoring a KD.

                    B-hop was the agressor and outlanded Pascal in every round.

                    Even if you count the bogus KD in round 1, give Pascal a 10-8 in round 3.

                    Its still a 116-110 win for Hopkins.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP