The Hopkins nuthuggery is shameful

**Russian Crushin** · 12-19-2010, 04:27 AM

Post with your real account and not your alt you biitch

**Main Source** · 12-19-2010, 04:28 AM

Originally posted by British Pride

Anyone who says "robbery" has no knowledge of the sport.

Anyone trying to discuss, start AND end a topic with one line and an alt gets treated the same way:

YOU don't know your **** and get the **** out. Over.

**seany1** · 12-19-2010, 04:29 AM

hopkins clearly won so i think its you that has no knowledge of the sport . im not a hopkins fan btw

**Canelo Phresh** · 12-19-2010, 04:34 AM

go wathc ufc you worthless ****.

**DonairesRevenge** · 12-19-2010, 04:36 AM

Originally posted by seany1

hopkins clearly won

For Hopkins to clearly have won he would need to have won every single round after 4. There was 3 swing rounds the second half of the fight which could have went either way. Those rounds decided the fight. Whichever way the fight has been scored by anyone there should not be anymore than a 2 point margain for either fighter. A 2 point margain either way is not a robbery.

Boxing noobs

**DonairesRevenge** · 12-19-2010, 04:37 AM

Originally posted by ChainskiBum

go wathc ufc you worthless ****.

If you're going to try and insult someone at least spell properly, idiot.

**The Evil 1-2** · 12-19-2010, 04:38 AM

Originally posted by British Pride

Anyone who says "robbery" has no knowledge of the sport.

I share your same argument, but you need to present it in a less off-putting manner. I had the fight 113-113, but I had B-Hop winning most of the rounds. Those two knockdowns were so damn crucial for Pascal.

**seany1** · 12-19-2010, 04:38 AM

says the ***** using his alt account haha NOOB

**maxorido** · 12-19-2010, 04:38 AM

Just to clarify... do you, or do you not believe Hopkins won that fight?

The Hopkins nuthuggery is shameful