Comments Thread For: Jean Pascal, Bernard Hopkins Fight To a Majority Draw
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
They are not "major considerations" you fkn Wally.
They are worth one point, and that is all.
Jeez, fkn **** Manny-fan's that know nothing about boxing
I knew you were referring to Marquez when you made that same comment on the other Hopkins thread
You Manny fan's seem to think that a knockdown is like half-a-knockout, or something. You seem to somehow think that a knockdown means that you have won half the fight, or that you are halfway there, or something, I dunno?
Dude, a flash knockdown is nothing. And if your knockdown was not a flash knockdown, then surely you can finish the job if that fighter is really hurt? or if you can't finish the job, then at least you now have a foundation to break him down so that you can get advantage from the knockdown later in the fight.
Many title fights have been won by the guy who got knocked down.
You guys need to go down to the gym and lace em up.Comment
-
1 and 3 were arguably 10-9 rounds because popkins really won them based on accurate punching and activity.
Pascal lost by at least 5 rounds at LEASTComment
-
It's a matter of perception. Had they have 5 judges instead of 3 would likely produce a "winner" that can go either way. I am only voicing my views, do we have to go through profanity and name-calling because of differences of opinions here?They are not "major considerations" you fkn Wally.
They are worth one point, and that is all.
Jeez, fkn **** Manny-fan's that know nothing about boxing
I knew you were referring to Marquez when you made that same comment on the other Hopkins thread
You Manny fan's seem to think that a knockdown is like half-a-knockout, or something. You seem to somehow think that a knockdown means that you have won half the fight, or that you are halfway there, or something, I dunno?
Dude, a flash knockdown is nothing. And if your knockdown was not a flash knockdown, then surely you can finish the job if that fighter is really hurt? or if you can't finish the job, then at least you now have a foundation to break him down so that you can get advantage from the knockdown later in the fight.
Many title fights have been won by the guy who got knocked down.
You guys need to go down to the gym and lace em up.
I called a Pascal victory by a "hair"....and you're upset?
If I called a UD, then you can be really upset, rightly so, but I didn't. "by a hair" meant that "to each his own reading". There's no definite answer to these because apparently even the 3 judges saw it differently than yours.
And if it is so clear and apparent, then the author of this thread wouldn't even have this very thread. Because it is so "close" that they called it a draw.
But I don't have any attached feelings to this very fight. Apparently you are so and clearly you seemed upset.
So I respect your opinions and others. I just see this "by a hair" to Pascal.Comment
-
You saw a Pascal win by a hair? lol! It must be a **** hair cuz he was gifted a draw. He only won 3 maybe 4 rounds if you're generous. Check your prescription on those glasses man.It's a matter of perception. Had they have 5 judges instead of 3 would likely produce a "winner" that can go either way. I am only voicing my views, do we have to go through profanity and name-calling because of differences of opinions here?
I called a Pascal victory by a "hair"....and you're upset?
If I called a UD, then you can be really upset, rightly so, but I didn't. "by a hair" meant that "to each his own reading". There's no definite answer to these because apparently even the 3 judges saw it differently than yours.
And if it is so clear and apparent, then the author of this thread wouldn't even have this very thread. Because it is so "close" that they called it a draw.
But I don't have any attached feelings to this very fight. Apparently you are so and clearly you seemed upset.
So I respect your opinions and others. I just see this "by a hair" to Pascal.Comment
-
No, no, I wasn't really commenting at all on who I think won the fight.....It's a matter of perception. Had they have 5 judges instead of 3 would likely produce a "winner" that can go either way. I am only voicing my views, do we have to go through profanity and name-calling because of differences of opinions here?
I called a Pascal victory by a "hair"....and you're upset?
If I called a UD, then you can be really upset, rightly so, but I didn't. "by a hair" meant that "to each his own reading". There's no definite answer to these because apparently even the 3 judges saw it differently than yours.
And if it is so clear and apparent, then the author of this thread wouldn't even have this very thread. Because it is so "close" that they called it a draw.
But I don't have any attached feelings to this very fight. Apparently you are so and clearly you seemed upset.
So I respect your opinions and others. I just see this "by a hair" to Pascal.
..... and you are more than entitled to your opinion, which I will respect.
" It's a matter of perception "
As to who won the fight? Sure, absolutely.....
..... but as far as this goes..... " the KDs are major considerations "
No way !!
Knockdowns are NOT " major considerations "
..... knockdowns are only worth 1 point, and NEVER more than that.
Maybe that is why some Manny fan's struggle with the result from Pac/JMM-I? That fight was even just after the halfway mark.....
..... as was the Hopkins fight.Comment
-
The Look Of A Gift Decision...
Just check out the look on Pascals face after the Belts were put on - obviously he KNOWS he got a Christmas Gift Early...
Comment
-
The look on the fighters face is almost always an accurate indicatorJust check out the look on Pascals face after the Belts were put on - obviously he KNOWS he got a Christmas Gift Early...
http://www.montrealgazette.com/sport...498/story.html
Pascal looked just like Manny did before the winner was announced in his second fight with Marquez.Comment
Comment