Tweet
After losing a one sided fight against supposed tune up in Raheem, Bob Arum still put Pacquiao against Morales. In fact, listen closely to what he says.
and Finally....Pacquiao's reaction.
Get em boy, get em.
-
After losing a one sided fight against supposed tune up in Raheem, Bob Arum still put Pacquiao against Morales. In fact, listen closely to what he says.
and Finally....Pacquiao's reaction.
Get em boy, get em. -
rofl Arum cracks me up.
"Of course he's fighting Pacquiao" -
gotta love Bob he just don't give a ****Comment
-
aahahhahaha that just resume how Arum's work, when he decides something, nothing will change his mind. I hate this guyComment
-
goddamn bob arum lol
hes making manny look really pathetic right nowComment
-
it was priceless-lol--
i do see people's argument though on why manny took erik instead of zahir--erik beat manny in their 1st fight, but he should have in no way ducked raheem the way he did--
manny ducks fighters through his promoter and team--it's kind of like he's taking the steam off of him--but that don't fly with me--
manny plays it safe by saying it's up to his promoter--because bob arum is a sissy when it comes to matching manny with fighters who would and could beat him decisively--ala raheem and floyd and shane back in 2009--
look at it this way little homeys---it was arum who didn't want to put cotto in the ring with floyd back in late 2005 and all of 2006--and even 2007--just look at how cotto answered the questions asked of him about fighting floyd--which goes on to show me that cotto was really only about the big payday--
does it seem ironic to you that his 2 biggest stars after floyd always answered with, it's up to my promoter--and you people claim it's not in their nature to call a fighter out--by trash talking him--they just fight--but bob arum knows how basically impossible it is for cotto and manny to ever come close to beating floyd--which is why after cotto came to back to back fights of floyd--he kept his mouth shut about fighting him---basically at bob's demand--
bob said pretty much anyway--hell no--why waste cotto fighting floyd, a no win fight for him, when i can throw margarito at floyd--because after he loses to floyd, who really cares--cotto is still his top fighter--
think about it kids--it's been so obvious--there was no way in hell bob was going to put manny in their with raheem--it was a no win situation--moralles was the legend--zahir was just the better fighter at the time--no drawing power like erik--and manny didn't speak up wanting to fight raheem either-lol---
bob arum is a greedy snake, but a genius in this regard also--why do you think it took manny so long to fight marquez again--
toprank can lie to the public all they want, seeing how majority of casual fans are gullible and naive when it comes to boxing anyway-lol
it doesn't really matter to him--as long as he gets the fans to love his fighters so much that he gets more money--you see after he matched up cotto and margarito and clottey with manny--he threw those guys away--manny is his star fighter---he banks on manny the same way he did with de la hoya and floyd jr...
just pay attention people--keep an open mind--you have to when dealing with toprank's head honcho--bobo arum--lolComment
-
it was not that long ago when bob called floyd the greatest fighter of the last 40 years--he wasn't talking so much about his resume at the time--he was talking about that ****er's skill and talent--it's scary--bob is a student of the game, i'll give him that--he actually knows fighters' skillset--and he knew raheem was too much for manny at the time--why risk another star fighter who is now his top star fighter--Comment
-
Now that was funny as hell.Comment
-
Sometimes Arum can be a funny dude lolComment
-
LOL @ Arum
"Of course he's fighting him!"
But hey, I'm sure Judah vs Mayweather is more justifiable
Comment
Comment