Khan has the best resume at 140

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Drunk Punch
    In Asia
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2006
    • 5823
    • 172
    • 130
    • 12,619

    #11
    Not necessarily. I'd argue that if Bradley beats Alexander he draws level with Khan.

    Then they fight it out for the no1 spot.

    Comment

    • bruzza
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 259
      • 9
      • 4
      • 6,329

      #12
      Originally posted by Akucapri
      Khan also fought a Prime Barrera.

      /jk
      Hahahaha. I mean you just got to laugh

      Comment

      • talz
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2009
        • 1344
        • 52
        • 2
        • 12,427

        #13
        The rankings don't matter so much at the moment because when its all said and done the winner of bradley/alex will fight khan, to determine the #1 at 140.

        Comment

        • Grimmer
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2008
          • 4271
          • 300
          • 354
          • 10,636

          #14
          Originally posted by Akucapri
          Khan also fought a Prime Barrera.
          Khan also fought a prime, undefeated Breidis Prescott.

          Comment

          • £-4-£
            Liverpool FC
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2009
            • 2750
            • 165
            • 319
            • 28,401

            #15
            Originally posted by RichCCFC
            1. Khan (Maidana, Kotelnik, Malignaggi, Salita)
            2. Bradley (Holt, Peterson, Witter)
            3. Alexander (Kotelnik, Witter, Urango)
            Malignaggi is a better name to have on your resume than Peterson or Holt:

            Malignaggi:

            - Former world-champion with 2 successful defense.
            - Had a close fight with Cotto.
            - Challenged Hatton for the lineal title at 140lbs.
            - Notable wins over N'dou (x2), N'goudjo, and 2 wins over Juan Diaz.

            Peterson:

            - Former WBO-champion (0 defenses).
            - No marquee wins on his resume.

            Holt:


            - Former WBO champion.
            - Notable wins over Ricardo Torres, Demetrius Hopkins, David Diaz.
            - Loses against Torres, Thomas Davis? wtf.
            - Gone on to lose vs. Mabuza.

            Therefore, Khan's win over Malignaggi (in Malignaggi's home-town) is better than Bradley's wins over Peterson and Holt.


            Bradley's win over Witter is impressive, and was in the UK. But Witter was past-prime, but his win is better than Alexander's win over Witter.

            Khan beat a prime-Kotelnik, dominated him infact for 12 rounds. Alexander LOST to Kotelnik, 8 rounds to 4 IMO. So Khan's resume is automatically better than Alexander's.

            Khan's win over a prime-Maidana, who was in the shape of his life, is better than Bradley's wins over Witter and Miguel Vazquez. Bradley's win over Edner Cherry is unremarkable, Cherry had 5 losses prior to fighting Bradley, Bradley was supposed to beat Cherry. Khan at least gets some credit for KO'ing Salita. Salita and Cherry were both C-class fighters.

            Maidana > Miguel Vazquez, past-prime Witter, and Edner Cherry.

            Khan has great wins over Maidana and Kotelnik. And a good win over Malignaggi.

            Bradley has good wins over Peterson, Holt, past-prime Witter, and Vazquez.


            Khan's resume > Bradley's.

            1) Khan
            2) Bradley
            3) Kotelnik
            4) Alexander
            Last edited by £-4-£; 12-15-2010, 11:51 AM.

            Comment

            • The_Demon
              Big dog
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2009
              • 13604
              • 1,354
              • 888
              • 22,971

              #16
              As of right now he does ye,hard to argue against that,if bradley beats devon id give him the edge

              Comment

              • minasyan
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Nov 2008
                • 915
                • 20
                • 61
                • 7,175

                #17
                Don't care what anyone says there is no way Devon won his fight against Kotelnik

                So if you think about it Kotelnik has a pretty good resume beating Devon and Maidana
                Last edited by minasyan; 12-15-2010, 12:33 PM.

                Comment

                • Pacquiao'd
                  Banned
                  • Mar 2010
                  • 11948
                  • 612
                  • 153
                  • 12,591

                  #18
                  Originally posted by minasyan
                  Don't care what anyone says there is no way Devon won his fight against Kotelnik

                  So if you think about it Kotelnik has a pretty good resume beating Devon and Maidana
                  agree. devon CLEARLY lost. anyone that says otherwise is blind

                  Comment

                  • talz
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2009
                    • 1344
                    • 52
                    • 2
                    • 12,427

                    #19
                    Originally posted by £-4-£
                    Malignaggi is a better name to have on your resume than Peterson or Holt:

                    Malignaggi:

                    - Former world-champion with 2 successful defense.
                    - Had a close fight with Cotto.
                    - Challenged Hatton for the lineal title at 140lbs.
                    - Notable wins over N'dou (x2), N'goudjo, and 2 wins over Juan Diaz.

                    Peterson:

                    - Former WBO-champion (0 defenses).
                    - No marquee wins on his resume.

                    Holt:


                    - Former WBO champion.
                    - Notable wins over Ricardo Torres, Demetrius Hopkins, David Diaz.
                    - Loses against Torres, Thomas Davis? wtf.
                    - Gone on to lose vs. Mabuza.

                    Therefore, Khan's win over Malignaggi (in Malignaggi's home-town) is better than Bradley's wins over Peterson and Holt.


                    Bradley's win over Witter is impressive, and was in the UK. But Witter was past-prime, but his win is better than Alexander's win over Witter.

                    Khan beat a prime-Kotelnik, dominated him infact for 12 rounds. Alexander LOST to Kotelnik, 8 rounds to 4 IMO. So Khan's resume is automatically better than Alexander's.

                    Khan's win over a prime-Maidana, who was in the shape of his life, is better than Bradley's wins over Witter and Miguel Vazquez. Bradley's win over Edner Cherry is unremarkable, Cherry had 5 losses prior to fighting Bradley, Bradley was supposed to beat Cherry. Khan at least gets some credit for KO'ing Salita. Salita and Cherry were both C-class fighters.

                    Maidana > Miguel Vazquez, past-prime Witter, and Edner Cherry.

                    Khan has great wins over Maidana and Kotelnik. And a good win over Malignaggi.

                    Bradley has good wins over Peterson, Holt, past-prime Witter, and Vazquez.


                    Khan's resume > Bradley's.

                    1) Khan
                    2) Bradley
                    3) Kotelnik
                    4) Alexander
                    Can't really argue with that, nicely put.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP