Do Bradley and Khan seem like opportunists to anybody?

[Iceta Lives]

I can't help but come to this conclusion I guess. Because when you stop to think about it, it seemed like both guys would act like Alexander and Maidana didn't even exist until they both struggled with Kotelnik and Corley respectively. Does anybody think these fights would be happening if any of that wouldn't have went down?

[Sparked_1985]

Isn't Maidana Khan's mandatory?

[infamous larryx]

dont most fighters do this?

[Iceta Lives]

Isn't Maidana Khan's mandatory?

Yeah, but it seemed like Khan did everything to avoid the fight until after Maidana struggled the way he did against Corley.

[Sparked_1985]

Yeah, but it seemed like Khan did everything to avoid the fight until after Maidana struggled the way he did against Corley.

Well, he would have been stripped eventually and unless he had a fight with Alexander or Bradley he would have been back at square 1. So, I think he was snookered. Had to fight Maidana.

[MOTHER DUCKER]

No they were building up Khan after his KO loss and Roach wanted him to have one fight in America before facing up vs a very dangerous opponent like Maidana.

Bradley? maybe.. i think he honestly was trying to get Pacs attention.. realized it wasn't happening so decided to get it on with Alexander. I didn't fall for this bull **** nsb crap about Bradley ducking Alexander.. Bradley has faced tough guys before.. he fought big punchers like Holt and had signed to fight Maidana.. No reason to duck Alexander.. who's power is vastly overated and has no chance of outboxing Timmy