Would you like to see random OST permanently instituted in boxing?

[IMDAZED]

I think it's pretty obvious everyone is in favor of it but lets leave bizarro land for a second and let me ask a more important question. Whos gonna pay for it????????????

Those who can, can. Those who can't, can't. How do you think the testing in place today began?

[Absolute---]

We talking about implementing the modified version of OST or real OST?

[IMDAZED]

We talking about implementing the modified version of OST or real OST?

We're talking about what USADA feels is suitable for boxing.

[ModernTalking]

I would, boxing is already dangerous enough. There have been fighters who died in the ring. A brutal sport like boxing needs to do everything possible to try to eliminate cheating. What do you say, yes or no, why or why not?

Please......NOOOOOOOO

If there was OSDT than there would be no fight ever. The moment someone agree to do OSDT the other guy would go on vacation. That mean there would be no fight.

[DET. IRONSIDE]

Those who can, can. Those who can't, can't. How do you think the testing in place today began?

I'm pretty sure you could make OST mandatory for all world title fights.

That would be a big watershed if that happenned.

[Absolute---]

If the USDA wants to implement the modified version then no. But if it's real OST then yes.

[tomjo]

Okay, we all know it's too expensive to do it for every fight.

Why not do a set amount per year on random fights? Say for example (dont quote me on the numbers, they're completely random) every weight in boxing has 100 opportunities to test fighters on a year - during any time of the year - fight or no fight. No one would know who's going to be tested other than the commision... Surely that would cut down the cost and risk? I mean obviously some people are going to try and flout the law but it would be better than what's happening now wouldn't it?

[IMDAZED]

I'm pretty sure you could make OST mandatory for all world title fights.

That would be a big watershed if that happenned.

It would take quite a movement but look around...it's coming.

[IMDAZED]

Okay, we all know it's too expensive to do it for every fight.

Why not do a set amount per year on random fights? Say for example (dont quote me on the numbers, they're completely random) every weight in boxing has 100 opportunities to test fighters on a year - during any time of the year - fight or no fight. No one would know who's going to be tested other than the commision... Surely that would cut down the cost and risk? I mean obviously some people are going to try and flout the law but it would be better than what's happening now wouldn't it?

Commissions like to say money is the issue but they don't mean the cost of the actual tests...they mean the risk of losing big money fights from promoters who don't want their guys to undergo testing.

[mrcupide2]

Whoever says no is a ****ing dumbass *******...you guys do realize that one cheater can ruin your caereer? Imagine working allyour life to bea champ and getting cheated seriously