wikileaks: pacquiao-marquez scorecards revealed.....95% had marquez winning....

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • REDRUM619
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Apr 2010
    • 528
    • 27
    • 42
    • 7,033

    #61
    Originally posted by Mighty_Windir
    Pac beat him.

    **** the people that can't give it a rest.

    I had it 114-113 for Pacman.

    Let it go.
    no one gives a **** about your scorecard obviously u dont know **** about boxing

    Comment

    • Rolaz
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 2347
      • 68
      • 0
      • 8,719

      #62
      Why they didn't file formal protest to the

      Comment

      • Rolaz
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 2347
        • 68
        • 0
        • 8,719

        #63
        After the fight, Why didn't they file Formal Protest to the World Boxing body so that Rematch was held!

        Why quack now after 2 years has gone?

        Next time when Pacman fights Marquez, apply as the Official Judge!

        Comment

        • REDRUM619
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Apr 2010
          • 528
          • 27
          • 42
          • 7,033

          #64
          Originally posted by indystress
          anyone can come up with a list and the percentage favoring one fighter over another would vary...to say the 95% experts thought marquez won is really stretching it...

          when marquez/katsidis was going on, larry merchant went on to say during the fight that "alot of people felt that marquez won atleast one fight"...merchant went on to say "well im not one of them"...then lampley responded with "same here"

          so who won both pac/marquez fights can be debated over and over...both fights were close to a point that it didnt matter who won. atleast it was scored very close compared to the first castillo/mayweather that had floydie winning a fight that he got outlanded 2 to 1...i dont know how a boxer can be outlanded by a 2 to 1 margin and still win...that my friends, the first mayweather/castillo fight is more questionable then either of pac/marquez fights.
          what they meant by that is that they thought he won both fights true story

          Comment

          • STEELHEAD
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Nov 2004
            • 14730
            • 537
            • 478
            • 27,196

            #65
            this was the fight that raised the contraversy of ringside scores verses
            watching it on tv scores. this one was a tuff one to score.

            what was quite telling was they had some ringside scorers, boxing scribes included, who ringside scored it for pacquiao, rewatch it on tv.
            all scored it for marquez second watch.

            Comment

            • La Zorrita
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Aug 2010
              • 1317
              • 131
              • 44
              • 1,701

              #66
              Originally posted by JaguarJames
              even nathanielsz scored it for marquez and fellow pac nuthugger chino trinidad went so far as to call for an investigation to make sure there wasnt any corruption.
              nathanielz only nuthugs pac becoz it is his job and he wants to avoid getting fired deep inside he doesnt give a **** on pacroid... he supports amir more than pac

              Comment

              • kuhl_jackman
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Dec 2008
                • 177
                • 5
                • 0
                • 6,258

                #67
                Originally posted by REDRUM619
                what they meant by that is that they thought he won both fights true story

                The root word is they THOUGHT, thye thought marquez won both fights but in reality its a draw and SD for PAC so move on! stop whining! LOL

                Comment

                • S H A R K B O Y
                  Below The Heavens
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 3252
                  • 184
                  • 404
                  • 10,687

                  #68
                  The point is, even with all those knockdowns Pacquiao had against Marquez, most level headed, unbiased people had the fight slightly toward Marquez. A gust of wind can knockdown Marquez, but only a truely superior technical fighter can beat Marquez at 140lbs or lower.

                  Comment

                  • Jack Kollin
                    Up and Comer
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 37
                    • 4
                    • 1
                    • 6,059

                    #69
                    What year is it?.. I thought it's december 2010?

                    Comment

                    • pocket_rockets
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • May 2010
                      • 177
                      • 10
                      • 0
                      • 6,257

                      #70
                      Damn, how long was this? Get over it man!!! It was a close fight that could've gone either way. It wasn't like their first fight that ended up a draw coz a Judge admitted he made a scoring mistake in the first round. Should have been a W for Pac. i don't see too many whiners bout this. I know most of these fkn whiners are *****s. Get a life!!! Your boy won't be back... unless Pac decides to retire now.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP