Don't matter if the Pope, f**k that God himself, judged it for Marquez, unless he was one of the 3 men at ringside paid to score the fight officially, then it don't matter.
You can disagree all you want, or incorrectly call it a robbery (just a razor thin fight) all you want, but it won't change the fact Marquez collected the L.
Sports have rules, and unless the fight ends before the 12, the 3 men at ringside say who won, not the writers, not Nonito Donaire (doesn't he dislike Pacquiao to the point he was ripping on him after the Darchinyan fight?) or anyone else.
in short Pacquiao's got scoreboard, and Marquez has
anyone can come up with a list and the percentage favoring one fighter over another would vary...to say the 95% experts thought marquez won is really stretching it...
when marquez/katsidis was going on, larry merchant went on to say during the fight that "alot of people felt that marquez won atleast one fight"...merchant went on to say "well im not one of them"...then lampley responded with "same here"
so who won both pac/marquez fights can be debated over and over...both fights were close to a point that it didnt matter who won. atleast it was scored very close compared to the first castillo/mayweather that had floydie winning a fight that he got outlanded 2 to 1...i dont know how a boxer can be outlanded by a 2 to 1 margin and still win...that my friends, the first mayweather/castillo fight is more questionable then either of pac/marquez fights.
Only hardcore *******os and blind people think Manny won either fight.
JMM is his father.
Every time my Grandpa speaks of that fight I tell him about this wikileaks and he agrees.....
We are Mexicans
And one thing its clear whenever its a close decision the cash cow gets it its just simply an unwritten rule on boxing....
And we all know if pac would of loss his stock would of gone down dramatically, and ill never forget his face when he was announced the winner he was crying cuz he knew he got owned.....
Comment