Confess: Has your favorite fighter ever won a decision you felt they shouldn't have?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bushbaby
    Wild Apache
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 23513
    • 727
    • 370
    • 32,078

    #21
    Originally posted by Russian Crushin
    Or Martinez either
    That's ur opinion,outside of rounds 2-3,that fight was very close!!

    Comment

    • project xxx1
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2009
      • 12868
      • 764
      • 1,289
      • 22,511

      #22
      Originally posted by BoxeoBoriqua
      damn, 4 rounds for dirrell???? ****, i gave it 2 froch by a round.
      yep i had my own fighter losing by 4 rounds,dirrell should of won that,lucky froch fought at home,lol

      Comment

      • Irish Hitman
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 4125
        • 95
        • 78
        • 11,022

        #23
        Berto vs Collazo was a dodgy one but my boy Paulie gt robbed vs Juan Diaz in the 1st fight..

        Comment

        • -Kev-
          this is boxing
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2006
          • 39960
          • 5,045
          • 1,449
          • 234,543

          #24
          I like how first the 119-110 scorecard was the only problem with the Williams-Martinez fight, people said. They said if they that scorecard was closer, they would have been okay with it. Now little by little, people are beginning to change history and try to act like Martinez was robbed blindly when in fact that was a close fight. I saw Martinez dominating 1, 2, 3, 4 but then out of nowhere turned to shit in 5, 6, 7, 8, and from there the fight was basically for whoever wanted it more but Martinez kept taking rounds off and I had for Williams by a close but clear decision.

          Comment

          • Dan...
            Fredette About It
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 7675
            • 454
            • 951
            • 19,200

            #25
            Originally posted by -Kev-
            I like how first the 119-110 scorecard was the only problem with the Williams-Martinez fight, people said. They said if they that scorecard was closer, they would have been okay with it. Now little by little, people are beginning to change history and try to act like Martinez was robbed blindly when in fact that was a close fight. I saw Martinez dominating 1, 2, 3, 4 but then out of nowhere turned to shit in 5, 6, 7, 8, and from there the fight was basically for whoever wanted it more but Martinez kept taking rounds off and I had for Williams by a close but clear decision.
            Yeah. Anyone who can analyse that fight round-by-round and call it a robbery just flat out knows nothing about boxing.

            Comment

            • -Kev-
              this is boxing
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2006
              • 39960
              • 5,045
              • 1,449
              • 234,543

              #26
              The first time I saw the Berto-Collazo fight live on HBO, I screamed robbery. I did not score the fight the first time, I was watching it with my friends and drinking. I then sat down and watched the fight in my computer, had my notepad to score the rounds, and I actually had Berto winning. So I don't know if that counts but at first I thought Berto got a gift, then I saw it again and saw he was the stronger fighter in the championship rounds and he rally hustled for those points at the end.

              Comment

              • Rabbit ♠
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2009
                • 3610
                • 169
                • 310
                • 4,528

                #27
                Originally posted by -Kev-
                I like how first the 119-110 scorecard was the only problem with the Williams-Martinez fight, people said. They said if they that scorecard was closer, they would have been okay with it. Now little by little, people are beginning to change history and try to act like Martinez was robbed blindly when in fact that was a close fight. I saw Martinez dominating 1, 2, 3, 4 but then out of nowhere turned to shit in 5, 6, 7, 8, and from there the fight was basically for whoever wanted it more but Martinez kept taking rounds off and I had for Williams by a close but clear decision.
                Yep. I was one of the guys that scored it for Williams. I remember thinking the 119-110 was fucked up, but the right guy won.

                Had Martinez won that fight, I wouldn't have been bothered by it. It could have went either way, but a robbery it was not.

                Comment

                • -Kev-
                  this is boxing
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 39960
                  • 5,045
                  • 1,449
                  • 234,543

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Dan...
                  Yeah. Anyone who can analyse that fight round-by-round and call it a robbery just flat out knows nothing about boxing.
                  Every close fight that goes in favor of the fighter a fan doesn't like, is a robbery nowadays. Just depends who you talk to. The neutral person would say it was a close fight and could have gone either way, the bias, robbery screaming fool will scream robbery.

                  Comment

                  • jazluvr
                    I'm a voodoo chile
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 281831
                    • 3,395
                    • 5,059
                    • 720

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Russian Crushin
                    Clottey Yes

                    But he won Molsey
                    Originally posted by VatoMulatto
                    Yeah I had Clottey winnng 115-113, but Cotto did beat Mosley. A close fight but still Cotto was the clear winner IMO.

                    Didn't Clottey admit at the post fight interview that he didn't do enough to win the championship rounds? Cotto was still aggressive and landing and ended that fight with great left hook to Clottey's jaw. Clottey gassed out. Clottey-115-113?? Plus the kd in the 1st round sealed it, even if it was a flash kd, Cotto is the 1st to have ever put him on the canvas. More like Cotto-114-113.

                    Comment

                    • TheMexHurricane
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Oct 2010
                      • 2719
                      • 120
                      • 0
                      • 9,177

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Rabbit ♠
                      The kind of decision where you went:



                      Cause you weren't really expecting your guy to win, but you weren't really pissed about the decision.

                      Fess up.
                      Chavez-Whitaker and Ramirez Whitaker. Chavez didn't get the decision but no way it was a draw. At the time I lied to myself and said he'd actually won.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP