once and for all: who is the best out of these guys: morales, mab, jmm

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Left Hook Tua
    VATNIK
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 62306
    • 7,010
    • 1,581
    • 951,318

    #21
    celtics are garbage.

    Comment

    • LeeVanCleef
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 1795
      • 461
      • 547
      • 9,950

      #22
      Originally posted by lebrick

      just like celtics is always a notch above lakers..

      Comment

      • lebrick
        2/6 and counting
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Apr 2010
        • 2522
        • 1,018
        • 621
        • 34,154

        #23
        Originally posted by Cash Cow
        How are we defining who's the "greater" boxer? Resume? Wars they've been in? or Skill?
        best boxers were not rated on skills alone.. it's easy to showcase your skills against an overmatched opponent..

        best boxers were based on the combination of all you have stated above..

        Comment

        • lebrick
          2/6 and counting
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2010
          • 2522
          • 1,018
          • 621
          • 34,154

          #24
          Originally posted by Left Hook Tua
          celtics are garbage.
          Originally posted by LeeVanCleef
          look who's losing 3 in a row..

          Comment

          • Wild Blue Yonda
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2010
            • 1102
            • 49
            • 6
            • 7,596

            #25
            I went, tentatively, with Marquez. Anyone saying such-&-such is by far or, "undisputably," the best of the three, I could not disagree more.

            It is a damn close-run thing, & there is a legitimate case for any of the trio being ranked first, second, or third.

            Marquez by a nose, here.

            Comment

            • lebrick
              2/6 and counting
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2010
              • 2522
              • 1,018
              • 621
              • 34,154

              #26
              Originally posted by Wild Blue Yonda
              I went, tentatively, with Marquez. Anyone saying such-&-such is by far or, "undisputably," the best of the three, I could not disagree more.

              It is a damn close-run thing, & there is a legitimate case for any of the trio being ranked first, second, or third.

              Marquez by a nose, here.
              i got EM by a NOSE..

              Comment

              • serv
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Sep 2009
                • 13314
                • 1,555
                • 2,007
                • 20,812

                #27
                Erik Morales was the best during his prime... he is an exciting boxer in the ring. My opinion, sir.

                Comment

                • serv
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 13314
                  • 1,555
                  • 2,007
                  • 20,812

                  #28
                  Originally posted by lebrick
                  best boxers were not rated on skills alone.. it's easy to showcase your skills against an overmatched opponent..

                  best boxers were based on the combination of all you have stated above..
                  very good point, sir.

                  Comment

                  • 4773Y350NM3
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 897
                    • 13
                    • 0
                    • 7,035

                    #29
                    Originally posted by INJECT
                    Morales was a quitter and lost to Diaz and Raheem.

                    Barrera lost to Juarez and couldn't win a round against Pac.


                    They were good at beating small guys at 122 and did ok at 126.

                    But past that they were pretty much useless.


                    JMM by a country mile.
                    yeah JMM by a country mile, because Floyd beat him decisively compare to pac right? And oh yeah I got MAB winning agasint JMM without those deduction ******!

                    Comment

                    • lebrick
                      2/6 and counting
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 2522
                      • 1,018
                      • 621
                      • 34,154

                      #30
                      Originally posted by 4773Y350NM3
                      yeah JMM by a country mile, because Floyd beat him decisively compare to pac right? And oh yeah I got MAB winning agasint JMM without those deduction ******!
                      with the chin JMM had, i doubt he will ever win against the two prime for prime. he would wipe the floor with his a$$ and lucky to hear the last bell on the championship round..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP