Can Pacquiao succeed where Floyd failed and stop Shane Mosley?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -Lucas-
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jul 2010
    • 275
    • 12
    • 0
    • 382

    #51
    Originally posted by Freedom Fighter
    Vitali was old. You're ignoring that fact. PRIME Vitali would have gone through either age 26 or age 38 Briggs like a hot knife through butter.

    But the Vitali-Briggs fight should have been stopped in the 7th, certainly by the 9th round.

    Briggs didn't need to spend a week in hospital after his fight with Lennox.
    Sorry sir, I only deal with fact....

    By your own logic Lewis succeeded where Vitaly failed.....

    Not looking good for Vitaly's legacy is it...

    Comment

    • AFighter4U
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 3576
      • 63
      • 0
      • 9,768

      #52
      Originally posted by Di Bushbaby
      Whatever,it went 12 rounds,so does that mean that Pacman didn't dominate him??I mean by ur logic,that would be true!!As far as i'm concerned Pacman dominated him,but U said Floyd didn't dominate mosley & it was a boring ud,well that must apply to Pacman-Margarito as well,wouldn't it??
      Pac could have finished Marg at round 11 or even 12. He obviously held back since he didn't want to cause any more unnecessary damage to Marg.

      If you can't see that, then i'll simply leave it at that.

      Comment

      • johnm is...
        ****in *** Broads
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Oct 2005
        • 10700
        • 820
        • 1,382
        • 48,813

        #53
        Originally posted by Freedom Fighter
        I thought the Margarito-Pacquiao fight should have been a TKO 10.

        The referee was irresponsible to not stop the fight.

        Manny took pity on Margarito and let up in the last two rounds.

        And Mosley's face wasn't hideously marked up after the fight with Floyd, the way Margarito's face was after his fight with Pacquiao.
        Oh, so now we base how dominating a decision win is, on whether or not YOU thought it should be stopped? Don't flatter yourself.

        And you're seriously going to judge how dominating a fight is by the way a fighters face is marked at the end of the fight?

        Damn. So contrary to what we watched, I guess Clottey dominated Pacquiao.

        Comment

        • johnm is...
          ****in *** Broads
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Oct 2005
          • 10700
          • 820
          • 1,382
          • 48,813

          #54
          Tunney contradicts himself more than anyone I've ever seen. Then just ignores it when he get called out on it.

          Comment

          • Bushbaby
            Wild Apache
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2008
            • 23513
            • 727
            • 370
            • 32,078

            #55
            Originally posted by AFighter4U
            Pac could have finished Marg at round 11 or even 12. He obviously held back since he didn't want to cause any more unnecessary damage to Marg.

            If you can't see that, then i'll simply leave it at that.
            Listen this post wasn't for u,so if ur gonna butt in,at least understand what's going on!!I believe that pacman did indeed dominate Margarito,ok!!But the ts didn't think that Floyd dominated Mosley because it went to a decision,I was simply pointing out his obvious agenda & double standard........................unless of course u somehow agree with him that Floyd didn't dominate Mosley because it went 12,but that logic only applies to Floyd or something!!If U can't see that,which 1 of us is worse off??

            Comment

            • The Hammer
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 50797
              • 3,416
              • 8,704
              • 58,851

              #56
              Originally posted by Jack Napier Jr
              Sorry sir, I only deal with fact....

              By your own logic Lewis succeeded where Vitaly failed.....

              Not looking good for Vitaly's legacy is it...
              Shane hardly had a mark on his face after his fight with Floyd. Briggs face was in bad shape after his fight with Vitali. SHANE DIDN'T SPEND A WEEK IN HOSPITAL AFTER HIS FIGHT WITH FLOYD.

              Shane and Briggs are the same age: 38

              But Floyd was age 32 at the time of the fight not age 39 like Vitali. An age 32 version of Vitali would have stopped Briggs early.

              Last edited by The Hammer; 11-30-2010, 09:23 PM.

              Comment

              • Pullcounter
                no guts no glory
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2004
                • 42582
                • 549
                • 191
                • 49,739

                #57
                pac should be able to stop mosley

                Comment

                • Chief2ndzOnly!
                  Long Live Walt Liquor!!!!
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 12629
                  • 1,561
                  • 1,396
                  • 222,500

                  #58
                  Originally posted by Freedom Fighter
                  Shane hardly had a mark on his face after his fight with Floyd. Briggs face was in bad shape after his fight with Vitali. SHANE DIDN'T SPEND A WEEK IN HOSPITAL AFTER HIS FLIGHT WITH FLOYD.

                  Shane and Briggs are the same age: 38

                  But Floyd was age 32 at the time of the fight not age 39 like Vitali. An age 32 version of Vitali would have stopped Briggs early.

                  No. He went into hiding for 6 Months. I dont recall Shane calling for Pac after Floyd had him walking/fumbling around the ring like a two year old toddler.

                  Comment

                  • Walt Liquor
                    the opposite of pure
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 21667
                    • 913
                    • 1,369
                    • 40,313

                    #59
                    Originally posted by The Gambler1981
                    I was talking about comparing wins over the same guy, between the two fighters.

                    To me who got there first is always greater than sloppy seconds.

                    Sorry if that does not compute with you.


                    Some guys do like fucking sloppy pussy though maybe you are that sort
                    Guess the dude who beat bhop in his first fight> roy jones then.


                    Wow, you're smart.

                    I'd gladly take the second shot btw, better than no shot at all.

                    Comment

                    • The Gambler1981
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2008
                      • 25961
                      • 521
                      • 774
                      • 49,039

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Walt Liquor
                      Guess the dude who beat bhop in his first fight> roy jones then.


                      Wow, you're smart.

                      I'd gladly take the second shot btw, better than no shot at all.
                      You really compare those situations? Like that?

                      You really take everything so literally?

                      I stand by what I said, if you get there first that is more impressive. You can find exception but really you are only proving the rule since you have to dig like that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP