Yeah, that's called timing. Oh wait, Manny is faster than Marquez so I guess that can't be it Maybe you can't differentiate between the two. Being fast doesn't automatically mean you just do that - it's not as if Shane is some slow poke.
Again Roy was less technical than every fighter he ever faced and was able to do that, so enough with ridiculous comparisons.
Originally posted by reedickyaluss
To be fair it isn't all one or all the other.
The combination of his technique, timing, and athleticism, all played apart.
Wouldn't be surprised if the ref steps in to save him.
Now come on, Reed. You're making it seem like Mosley isn't gonna caught Manny with anything big. Mosley can time Manny the same way he caught Floyd. After all, Mosley will have an easier target in front of him.
Ok, well you were implying speed had aboslutely ZERO to do with it.
Where in fact, it was a combination of everything... including his speed.
Umm...no. Let's try and stick to the topic here. What I'm saying is that the idea that Floyd beat Mosley because of "superior athleticism and speed" is just ******.
No less technical. As in he had less technique. He winged it which he was able to do based on superior athleticism.
And I disagree. LOL @ winged it. Please. Jones was a master of technique. Threw perfect hooks, perfect uppercuts, combinations. Good jab. Parried as good as any boxer today. Amazing footwork. Winged it? Yeah, ok.
Tweet
Maybe you can't differentiate between the two. Being fast doesn't automatically mean you just do that - it's not as if Shane is some slow poke.
Comment