Pacquiao: Fought Hatton at 140, why not Marquez? DUCK MOVE

Collapse
X
Collapse
  • Page of 2
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • loui_ludwig
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Oct 2005
    • 7669
    • 184
    • 2
    • 19,376
    #11
    Marquez fought Floyd at 147, why not Pacquiao?

    I really don't give a donkeys ass.

      Comment

      • HitmanHattonAY
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2010
        • 2138
        • 72
        • 167
        • 12,617
        #12
        Originally posted by loui_ludwig
        Marquez fought Floyd at 147, why not Pacquiao?

        I really don't give a donkeys ass.
        it was a catchweight of 144 !!!!!!!!!!!!

          Comment

          • Deevel916
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 7068
            • 282
            • 47
            • 13,675
            #13
            Originally posted by HitmanHattonAY
            it was a catchweight of 144 !!!!!!!!!!!!
            A catchweight which Floyd didnt live up to, and had to pay 600k for coming in heavier than the contractual weight.

              Comment

              Previous 1 2 template Next
              Working...
              TOP

              Sign In

              Forgot password?

              Register

              Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
              JOIN NOW