Hopkins is slightly right because Pacquaio blatantly ducked Zahir Raheem

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • vercingetorix3
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 1581
    • 73
    • 152
    • 8,356

    #21
    True, but seeing as how there are probably multiple threads about this very fact already, you have contributed absolutely nothing beneficial or thought-provoking to NSB in this instance.

    In fact, it's probably detrimental to the quagmire known as NSB, because you're probably more interested in flaming Pacquiao fans and preaching to your choir of Floyd fans than you are in actual discussion.

    Comment

    • DarchinyFAN
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2008
      • 2679
      • 147
      • 249
      • 9,208

      #22
      Was double header card for Morales and Pacquiao to showcase themselves in advance of a rematch at 130.

      Pacquiao destroyed Velazquez and Morales was derailed by Raheem. Pacquiao decided to face Morales who he had lost to in his previous fight, instead of Raheem.

      It was not a tournament situation.

      Pacquiao didn't move up to 135 until almost 3 years later.

      I think in my post I said a case could be made, but to call it a blatant duck is to show a blatant lack of knowledge or that you are blatantly biased.

      Seriously you are basing your case on Zahir Raheem , that's pretty weak.

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #23
        Just like Bernard Hopkins ducked Danny Green

        Comment

        • street bully
          Tua's daddy.
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2008
          • 25014
          • 696
          • 263
          • 35,118

          #24
          Raheem would have lost, but pacs promoter wanted none of it. I am a Pacquaio fan, but a lot of his groupies think he can do no wrong.

          Comment

          • -MAKAVELLI-
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Aug 2008
            • 50080
            • 3,580
            • 2,792
            • 169,000

            #25
            Originally posted by street bully
            Raheem would have lost, but pacs promoter wanted none of it.

            so he ducked a guy that would have beat..he ducked a guy that cant even convince his own mother to attend his fights


            great logic, Bully

            Comment

            • -MAKAVELLI-
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Aug 2008
              • 50080
              • 3,580
              • 2,792
              • 169,000

              #26
              Originally posted by -pound4pound-
              there are 3 categories of people that actually believe this;


              1. really ****** people
              2. noobs
              3. black supremacists





              PAC stayed for at least 6 more fights at 130 after his first fight with El Terrible...Raheem was at 135...a division that PAC didn't even go to til 2008...the Raheem win was in 2005



              and how did Raheem strengthen his campaign by getting a PAC fight?


              did he move down to 130? No

              did he put on an impressive string of wins that made the public demand it? No



              in securing a fight with PAC, Zahir 'Burger King' Raheem went out in his next fight and LOST to a faded ass Freitas



              HAPPY THANKSGIVING my ignorant, black supremacist noobs




              Bully,


              according to my demographic breakdown, i think you fall under category 1 and 3

              Comment

              • The_Demon
                Big dog
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jan 2009
                • 13603
                • 1,354
                • 888
                • 22,971

                #27
                Originally posted by -pound4pound-
                there are 3 categories of people that actually believe this;


                1. really ****** people
                2. noobs
                3. black supremacists





                PAC stayed for at least 6 more fights at 130 after his first fight with El Terrible...Raheem was at 135...a division that PAC didn't even go to til 2008...the Raheem win was in 2005



                and how did Raheem strengthen his campaign by getting a PAC fight?


                did he move down to 130? No

                did he put on an impressive string of wins that made the public demand it? No



                in securing a fight with PAC, Zahir 'Burger King' Raheem went out in his next fight and LOST to a faded ass Freitas



                HAPPY THANKSGIVING my ignorant, black supremacist noobs


                Haha spot on mate,TS looks very ****** now

                Comment

                • brick wall
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 6480
                  • 259
                  • 35
                  • 24,574

                  #28
                  Originally posted by street bully
                  Raheem would have lost, but pacs promoter wanted none of it. I am a Pacquaio fan, but a lot of his groupies think he can do no wrong.
                  nobody is hyping pac with regards to raheem. it's the opposite actually...this topic has been discussed a lot of times already and idiots keep bringing it up. if you talk about the best option (career and business wise) for pac during that time, raheem is out of the picture. they're in different weight category. so where is the "pac ducked raheem" coming from?

                  Comment

                  • Canelo Phresh
                    LUCAS KO'S FLOYD
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jun 2010
                    • 13714
                    • 829
                    • 1,353
                    • 23,724

                    #29
                    How dare you question Lord Pacquiao?!? Thats the dumb f@ck small d!cked ignorant nationalistic pride response you will always get from these morons no matter what factual or logical point you bring. Its really not even worth it. Watch them prove their ignorance by down playing sergios ko victory over punfinisher in all of the maravilla threads. they even hate marquez? f@ck they arent worth the time if your a logical minded person. all they know is hate and national pride.

                    Comment

                    • street bully
                      Tua's daddy.
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 25014
                      • 696
                      • 263
                      • 35,118

                      #30
                      Originally posted by -pound4pound-
                      Bully,


                      according to my demographic breakdown, i think you fall under category 1 and 3
                      Whatever man. You might even be darker than me, I'm Andre Ward black. Pacquaio should have fought Raheem, but wasn't Murad Muhammed in charg then, who said he kept him away.

                      I also think Floyd beats Pacquaio, he is still duckin him tho.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP