Comments Thread For: Juan Manuel Marquez Rips Margarito Over Pacquiao Loss
Collapse
-
Real boxing fans know that a one round swing either way is not a robbery. I have no problem with people thinking Pacquaio won or with thinking JMM won, but everyone should understand that both fights were nip and tuck. Claiming a robbery in either one makes you sound ******. If you really want to add up the damage... in two fights, JMM went down 4 times, Pacquiao never went down and in both of those fights, the knockdowns make the difference on the scorecards. So all you people who claim robbery need to STFU and learn how to understand that a super close fight cannot be a robbery....Comment
-
U ever heard of a scoring system idiot! Wat I do know is that Marquez skooled manny on both! Even after gettin dropped a few times lol.. now STFU & add that up!Real boxing fans know that a one round swing either way is not a robbery. I have no problem with people thinking Pacquaio won or with thinking JMM won, but everyone should understand that both fights were nip and tuck. Claiming a robbery in either one makes you sound ******. If you really want to add up the damage... in two fights, JMM went down 4 times, Pacquiao never went down and in both of those fights, the knockdowns make the difference on the scorecards. So all you people who claim robbery need to STFU and learn how to understand that a super close fight cannot be a robbery....Comment
-
That's just what I was thinking....
What's got people's panties stuck up their crack? What he said is exactly what happened. Marg had the power, height, size advantage in general. So, he should have trained more for the one thing that was his main weakness. Speed. If he was a bit faster, stayed further out with a good jab and worked on having his footwork a little bit cleaner, he would have done better....Hell, he may even have won by KO.
As it was, he was slow as ****, had no jab to speak of and his footwork was tragically bad. What Marquez said was simply what happened.Comment



Comment