Marquez "Margarito looked like a amateur!" says He could beat Cotto

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jonesy
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 1581
    • 105
    • 91
    • 1,948

    #41
    Originally posted by Michael Hall
    Marquez schooled the "Beast" twice already so I find it totally plausible that he thinks he can beat Margarito.
    You can't compare Pacquiao a few years ago to how he is now. Everybody can see how much he has improved. If anything Marquez has declined in performance.

    Don't get me wrong it would be a great fight early but Pac would ko him sooner or later.

    Comment

    • mikemurni
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2006
      • 2057
      • 50
      • 0
      • 8,401

      #42
      If he cant get a trilogy blame it on his promoter..

      Comment

      • dorruel2.0
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2009
        • 2064
        • 169
        • 16
        • 12,846

        #43
        Originally posted by rican411
        says his brother was on track to beat Juan Manuel Lopez if not for the injury LOL, why doesn't he fight him? Gay
        Marquez knocks Juanma out effortlessly.
        Originally posted by El 7 Mares V.2
        He did look quite amateurish, completely outclassed by a much quicker and evasive fighter indeed.
        So you want Marquez to lose yet you were rooting for cheato??
        you idiots never cease to amaze me. A fighter like marquez you does your country proud, and a fighter like tony who shames it, yet you choose the cheater. Says alot!!
        really does -_-

        Comment

        • dorruel2.0
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2009
          • 2064
          • 169
          • 16
          • 12,846

          #44
          Originally posted by jonesy
          You can't compare Pacquiao a few years ago to how he is now. Everybody can see how much he has improved. If anything Marquez has declined in performance.

          Don't get me wrong it would be a great fight early but Pac would ko him sooner or later.
          Negative. Marquez was the best fighter Manny has fought in years. Manny didnt improve much after that fight because he still fights the same. Thing is Marquez is a great fighter, fought without catchweight, and was on the wrong end of a decision i feel he deserved. / thread

          Comment

          • jonesy
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 1581
            • 105
            • 91
            • 1,948

            #45
            Originally posted by dorruel2.0
            Negative. Marquez was the best fighter Manny has fought in years. Manny didnt improve much after that fight because he still fights the same. Thing is Marquez is a great fighter, fought without catchweight, and was on the wrong end of a decision i feel he deserved. / thread
            haha what a clown, thinks he ended the thread with that drivel..

            completely irrelevant as a response to what i said. Not even going to waste my time talking to you. Bye

            lol Manny hasn't improved since Marquez

            Comment

            • davidoff
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Jun 2009
              • 857
              • 55
              • 27
              • 7,054

              #46
              Originally posted by rican411
              So JMM got DOMINATED cause of a weight advantage? NOt because Mayweather Jr is better? Fighters get DOMINATED all the tyme, no reason to compare me with Tito Trinidad, and everybody disscusses it, even your fat ass lol thats why boxing doesn't have meny fans cause you need to be a pro boxerto talk about the subject, and guess what WE"ER NOT ALL BOXERS LOL

              JMM fans are emotional people, they act like he didn't get dominated and made a fool of himself
              I didn't say he got dominated because of the weight. I said there's no shame in losing to Mayweather, especially when you have a weight disadvantage.

              It's clear that's what I meant, but nice attempt to twist my words.

              I know everyone discusses it, but one should have humility. Taking digs at someone for fighting Katsidis, chasing Pac, and losing against Mayweather seems odd.

              My point was that if you ever bothered to get in the ring (not as a pro, again you're twisting my words to hide how badly you've been exposed) then your attitude might change. And it will certainly remove your immaturity.

              Comment

              • Cafe
                Billionz Rican
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2009
                • 4202
                • 107
                • 90
                • 11,352

                #47
                Originally posted by davidoff
                I didn't say he got dominated because of the weight. I said there's no shame in losing to Mayweather, especially when you have a weight disadvantage.

                It's clear that's what I meant, but nice attempt to twist my words.
                I know everyone discusses it, but one should have humility. Taking digs at someone for fighting Katsidis, chasing Pac, and losing against Mayweather seems odd.

                My point was that if you ever bothered to get in the ring (not as a pro, again you're twisting my words to hide how badly you've been exposed) then your attitude might change. And it will certainly remove your immaturity.
                Well, you kinda ****** so your words can't make sense of them.

                Comment

                • jonesy
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 1581
                  • 105
                  • 91
                  • 1,948

                  #48
                  Originally posted by davidoff
                  I didn't say he got dominated because of the weight. I said there's no shame in losing to Mayweather, especially when you have a weight disadvantage.

                  It's clear that's what I meant, but nice attempt to twist my words.

                  I know everyone discusses it, but one should have humility. Taking digs at someone for fighting Katsidis, chasing Pac, and losing against Mayweather seems odd.

                  My point was that if you ever bothered to get in the ring (not as a pro, again you're twisting my words to hide how badly you've been exposed) then your attitude might change. And it will certainly remove your immaturity.
                  Don't worry bro, these rican's are illiterate.

                  Comment

                  • davidoff
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 857
                    • 55
                    • 27
                    • 7,054

                    #49
                    Originally posted by rican411
                    Well, you kinda ****** so your words can't make sense of them.
                    Are you in PR?

                    Comment

                    • fightingfigs
                      Undisputed Champion
                      • May 2008
                      • 4287
                      • 298
                      • 236
                      • 10,618

                      #50
                      Originally posted by Gino Ros
                      marquez would demolish juanma
                      In my opinion Cotto and Margarito would beat marquez based on the strength and weight alone. We saw what Mayweather and his extra weight could do to marquez.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP