Marquez "Margarito looked like a amateur!" says He could beat Cotto
Collapse
-
you idiots never cease to amaze me. A fighter like marquez you does your country proud, and a fighter like tony who shames it, yet you choose the cheater. Says alot!!
really does -_-Comment
-
Negative. Marquez was the best fighter Manny has fought in years. Manny didnt improve much after that fight because he still fights the same. Thing is Marquez is a great fighter, fought without catchweight, and was on the wrong end of a decision i feel he deserved. / threadComment
-
Negative. Marquez was the best fighter Manny has fought in years. Manny didnt improve much after that fight because he still fights the same. Thing is Marquez is a great fighter, fought without catchweight, and was on the wrong end of a decision i feel he deserved. / thread
completely irrelevant as a response to what i said. Not even going to waste my time talking to you. Bye
lol Manny hasn't improved since MarquezComment
-
So JMM got DOMINATED cause of a weight advantage? NOt because Mayweather Jr is better? Fighters get DOMINATED all the tyme, no reason to compare me with Tito Trinidad, and everybody disscusses it, even your fat ass lol thats why boxing doesn't have meny fans cause you need to be a pro boxerto talk about the subject, and guess what WE"ER NOT ALL BOXERS LOL
JMM fans are emotional people, they act like he didn't get dominated and made a fool of himself
It's clear that's what I meant, but nice attempt to twist my words.
I know everyone discusses it, but one should have humility. Taking digs at someone for fighting Katsidis, chasing Pac, and losing against Mayweather seems odd.
My point was that if you ever bothered to get in the ring (not as a pro, again you're twisting my words to hide how badly you've been exposed) then your attitude might change. And it will certainly remove your immaturity.Comment
-
I didn't say he got dominated because of the weight. I said there's no shame in losing to Mayweather, especially when you have a weight disadvantage.
It's clear that's what I meant, but nice attempt to twist my words.
I know everyone discusses it, but one should have humility. Taking digs at someone for fighting Katsidis, chasing Pac, and losing against Mayweather seems odd.
My point was that if you ever bothered to get in the ring (not as a pro, again you're twisting my words to hide how badly you've been exposed) then your attitude might change. And it will certainly remove your immaturity.Comment
-
I didn't say he got dominated because of the weight. I said there's no shame in losing to Mayweather, especially when you have a weight disadvantage.
It's clear that's what I meant, but nice attempt to twist my words.
I know everyone discusses it, but one should have humility. Taking digs at someone for fighting Katsidis, chasing Pac, and losing against Mayweather seems odd.
My point was that if you ever bothered to get in the ring (not as a pro, again you're twisting my words to hide how badly you've been exposed) then your attitude might change. And it will certainly remove your immaturity.Comment
-
Comment
Comment