Pacquiao would KO Trinidad.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 'Sugar' Freddi
    S.O.G
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 8889
    • 1,512
    • 1,575
    • 16,300

    #11
    See, this is the problem with this forum. Can never have a decent discussion without calling names and stuff. It's amazing, really.

    Didn't you guys also say that "Hatton would clinch and do damage to the body" against Pacquiao? How the hell can you clinch with someone when you can't catch them and countless power punches are coming at you from all angles? And you can't forget that Tito's chin wasn't the best out there either.

    Comment

    • kadyo's
      Grand Son
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2004
      • 23628
      • 2,648
      • 3,802
      • 56,474

      #12
      Originally posted by jrosales13
      I knew this messican would be offended.

      Comment

      • sigrab jr
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2009
        • 2865
        • 164
        • 215
        • 3,611

        #13
        Originally posted by 'Sugar' Freddi


        I'm biased because I have an opinion?
        There are such things as biased opinions.

        Like always blatantly favoring a certain fighter in a discussion. With the majority of your posts being opinions and hardly any facts. Never giving the benefit of the doubt when it comes to a discussion vs your fighter.

        You've already made two threads on who Pacquiao can beat[Mayweather and Trinidad] and in not one of them did you explain how you think Pacquiao will win. Just bold opinions. I know why I think Pacquiao beats Trinidad and I would have explained why I think so. The "under 5 rounds" was also absurd and gave away that you're being extremely biased to Pacquiao.

        Comment

        • jrosales13
          undisputed champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 32632
          • 739
          • 763
          • 40,023

          #14
          Originally posted by kadyo
          I knew this messican would be offended.


          I mean Kadyo, come on lets be real here you know....

          Pac is the man though. But, as a WW Tito would be too much.

          Pac is a great fighter all time and P4P. But, Tito beats him H2H.

          Pac would need a serious catch-weight.

          Comment

          • sigrab jr
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2009
            • 2865
            • 164
            • 215
            • 3,611

            #15
            Originally posted by 'Sugar' Freddi
            See, this is the problem with this forum. Can never have a decent discussion without calling names and stuff. It's amazing, really.

            Didn't you guys also say that "Hatton would clinch and do damage to the body" against Pacquiao? How the hell can you clinch with someone when you can't catch them and countless power punches are coming at you from all angles? And you can't forget that Tito's chin wasn't the best out there either.
            Comparing Hatton to Trinidad.

            Comment

            • SCtrojansbaby
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2009
              • 5960
              • 136
              • 72
              • 12,653

              #16
              Tito would win in dominating fashion. Too big too strong.

              Comment

              • jrosales13
                undisputed champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2008
                • 32632
                • 739
                • 763
                • 40,023

                #17
                Originally posted by 'Sugar' Freddi
                Don't get me wrong, big Tito fan right here. He was one bad mother ****er but that chin man, when Pac unleashes some lefts and rights, I see Trinidad hitting the canvas. I think Trinidad was slightly too one dimensional and relied a little bit too much on his power.

                I would pick Pac by KO inside 5 rounds.
                And, that would be the worse thing that could happen to Pac. That right there would be Pac downfall.

                Comment

                • 'Sugar' Freddi
                  S.O.G
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 8889
                  • 1,512
                  • 1,575
                  • 16,300

                  #18
                  Originally posted by sigrab jr
                  There are such things as biased opinions.

                  Like always blatantly favoring a certain fighter in a discussion. With the majority of your posts being opinions and hardly any facts. Never giving the benefit of the doubt when it comes to a discussion vs your fighter.

                  You've already made two threads on who Pacquiao can beat[Mayweather and Trinidad] and in not one of them did you explain how you think Pacquiao will win. Just bold opinions. I know why I think Pacquiao beats Trinidad and I would have explained why I think so. The "under 5 rounds" was also absurd and gave away that you're being extremely biased to Pacquiao.
                  Wait, a second, NO ONE, I mean NO ONE knows how a fighter will beat another fighter, especially some of you (can't say me because I have boxed in the amateurs) who NEVER put a boxing glove on before. How the hell are we supposed to know how one fighter beats another? When I made that thread about Pac beating Mayweather, I said and I quote: "Floyd never fought someone with such power in both hands, foot work, foot speed, hand speed, and stamina - NEVER. The shoulder roll crap works when Floyd is fighting someone who throws less punches and MUCH slower. That **** is not going to work if he fights Pac. Not to mention, Floyd has some problems with southpaws."

                  Did I just actually say "Pacquiao will beat Mayweather?" I don't think so. I said why I BELIEVE Pacquiao will beat him because of the footwork, foot speed, work rate, stamina, power, and whatnot that Pacquiao has.

                  Comment

                  • Doctor_Tenma
                    Monster
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 33313
                    • 1,327
                    • 1,249
                    • 58,127

                    #19
                    Originally posted by jrosales13
                    My feelngs exactly

                    Comment

                    • 'Sugar' Freddi
                      S.O.G
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 8889
                      • 1,512
                      • 1,575
                      • 16,300

                      #20
                      Originally posted by sigrab jr
                      Comparing Hatton to Trinidad.

                      I am not comparing. I said that you guys said the same thing about Hatton clinching with Pacquiao and whooping him in the body. My point was that you can't clinch with someone when you can't ****ing catch them around the ring.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP