Comparison: Floyd vs. Baldomir and Manny vs. Margarito

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Alibata
    Dugong Maharlika
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2004
    • 9047
    • 280
    • 33
    • 16,053

    #1

    Comparison: Floyd vs. Baldomir and Manny vs. Margarito

    Both slow, both durable, both lopsided victories. Any thoughts on this. Some say Floyd would have koed Margarito or done the same thing Manny did, maybe worse. Though Floyd beat Baldomir one sidedly, Baldomir did not get whooped as bad as margarito did against Pacquiao, at least physically. Any reason why, speak on this.
  • Hi-Dro
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 10362
    • 670
    • 640
    • 14,224

    #2
    Floyd would never do to Marg what Pac did. He doesn't want to get his hands broken. He also doesn't have that killer instinct anymore. Pac would have KO Baldomir within 4 rounds.

    Comment

    • ummeed
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2010
      • 1208
      • 61
      • 269
      • 7,394

      #3
      i don't know but i'm pretty sure tiger woods wouldn't have been bored enough to leave the venue and get some random hoes to **** just to wake himself up if he was watching pac-baldo.

      Comment

      • Phenom
        Phenomdeaux
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 12218
        • 494
        • 363
        • 101,474

        #4
        Tata is much better then this plasterless version of Margarito and Floyd vs baldomir was a relevant fight at the time.

        Comment

        • Alibata
          Dugong Maharlika
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2004
          • 9047
          • 280
          • 33
          • 16,053

          #5
          Originally posted by Phenom
          Tata is much better then this plasterless version of Margarito and Floyd vs baldomir was a relevant fight at the time.
          I highly doubt that. I still believe margarito was the harder puncher with or without plaster. He is definitely much better skilled, acurate and more technical then Baldo. As for significant, I think there were much much more significant fights. Baldomir vs. floyd isn't really a legendary nights type fight the way floyd vs. Margarito would have been or floyd vs. cotto.

          Comment

          • Phenom
            Phenomdeaux
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 12218
            • 494
            • 363
            • 101,474

            #6
            Originally posted by Alibata
            I highly doubt that. I still believe margarito was the harder puncher with or without plaster. He is definitely much better skilled, acurate and more technical then Baldo. As for significant, I think there were much much more significant fights. Baldomir vs. floyd isn't really a legendary nights type fight the way floyd vs. Margarito would have been or floyd vs. cotto.

            how is Margarito more skilled and the better technical boxer?


            as far as power just look at Margarito's vs Mosley Garcia and Pacquiao his only true asset is questionable
            Last edited by Phenom; 11-19-2010, 03:19 AM.

            Comment

            • jiraiyasama
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Nov 2010
              • 215
              • 12
              • 7
              • 6,303

              #7
              Originally posted by Phenom
              how is Margarito more skilled and the better technical boxer?


              as far as power just look at Margarito's vs Mosley Garcia and Pacquiao his only true asset is questionable
              This is embarassing, Stop hyping Baldomir. This is a DISGRACE.. You're making Floyd looked bad

              Comment

              • Alibata
                Dugong Maharlika
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2004
                • 9047
                • 280
                • 33
                • 16,053

                #8
                How do you explain how much better Margarito is without someone bringing up that he used plaster. You just know this by looking at how they fight. Regardless of the plaster, Margarito is just better in every way. Better foot work, better technique, better arsenal of punches, etc. just better. He also fought much better fighters and did well, check their records and you can see that margarito is way more experienced when it comes to facing top fighters. The plaster really degraded his career but margarito if not for the plaster ordeal, there would be no question that he is way more skilled then baldo however.

                Comment

                • Sweet Jesus
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 11512
                  • 568
                  • 332
                  • 13,576

                  #9
                  Pacquiao > Mayweather by a mile in this comparison.

                  Comment

                  • Phenom
                    Phenomdeaux
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 12218
                    • 494
                    • 363
                    • 101,474

                    #10
                    Originally posted by jiraiyasama
                    This is embarassing, Stop hyping Baldomir. This is a DISGRACE.. You're making Floyd looked bad
                    not hyping Baldomir at all but if we are being honest the only advantages Margarito had over him is power and size. and since Marg doesn't use his size well have no Jab and now NO POWER I believe tata is better then this version of Margarito
                    Last edited by Phenom; 11-19-2010, 03:33 AM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP