Speculation they didn't know for sure what the substance was and wanted to verify that Marg wasn't taking anything illegal. If they knew for sure they would've stopped the fight and Cheatto would probably be facing permanent banishment. I think it's you who is biased and doesn't want to see the parallels.
Some clear unbiased commentary for a change!
Collapse
-
-
Speculation they didn't know for sure what the substance was and wanted to verify that Marg wasn't taking anything illegal. If they knew for sure they would've stopped the fight and Cheatto would probably be facing permanent banishment. I think it's you who is biased and doesn't want to see the parallels.
Oh wait, that's right. None.
There are no parallels.
Just biased journalism.Comment
-
It doesn't matter it could have been Kool Aid for all we know. Nobody knows and that is why people test. I guess we should just give props to Manny's people for being smarter than cheatto's. I'm not going to speculate on any cheating allegations I just think it's fair for everybody to take the best testing. If Manny can demand non-commission directed testing then so can other fighters. Get a life man I love pac too but damn I'm not going to worship him.Comment
-
That's your opinion and I can respect it but I agree with Vivek as do others.Comment
-
It doesn't matter it could have been Kool Aid for all we know. Nobody knows and that is why people test. I guess we should just give props to Manny's people for being smarter than cheatto's. I'm not going to speculate on any cheating allegations I just think it's fair for everybody to take the best testing. If Manny can demand non-commission directed testing then so can other fighters. Get a life man I love pac too but damn I'm not going to worship him.
What substance did the Mayweather camp see Pacquiao taking on live television to justify their "speculations"?
Do you see what I'm trying to get here?
Pacquiao camp had probable cause to ask for testing.
Where's Mayweather's probable cause?
Nowhere to be found.
Nobody is trying to worship Pacquiao here.
We are establishing that the author of the article is indeed biased by ignoring the fact that the reasons the Pac camp asked for testing and the reasons for the Mayweather camp to ask for testing are based on completely different circumstances.Comment
-
Does 14 or 7 day cut off wasn't really that good of a compromise? Damn, I thought its a unbiased statement there..Comment
-
So you still haven't established the parallels between the two.
What substance did the Mayweather camp see Pacquiao taking on live television to justify their "speculations"?
Do you see what I'm trying to get here?
Pacquiao camp had probable cause to ask for testing.
Where's Mayweather's probable cause?
Nowhere to be found.
Nobody is trying to worship Pacquiao here.
We are establishing that the author of the article is indeed biased by ignoring the fact that the reasons the Pac camp asked for testing and the reasons for the Mayweather camp to ask for testing are based on completely different circumstances.Last edited by BoxingTech718; 11-17-2010, 07:44 AM.Comment
-
What probable cause, you're applying episodes of CSI now? Team pac isn't the commission and shouldn't have the power to demand anything unless the commission says so. Or isn't that the only argument team pac has against pac taking extra test? I don't have to establish anything the burden of proof is always on the accuser since you want to quote criminal jargon. Team pac didn't have any proof besides speculation of what Marg was taking end of story.
Talk about averting your eyes.Comment
-
Comment
Comment