Some clear unbiased commentary for a change!

[Ko King 212]

He drunk some splenda and that is why they needed a piss test?

Yes is hypocritical Roach.

And, I laughed the irony... There is no absolute reason to ask for a piss test cuz of some damn sweetener... Really, sweetener, a few splenda packets for his coffee and you want a piss test?

And, even if it was hydroxycut it doesn't contain ephedra anymore... So nothing illegal, nothing based to demand a piss test on the spot.

However, the piss test didn't happen as far as I know. But, Vivid said it did... I think that is a lie by him. Howeverr, I was just skimming through it not really reading it. So I don't know in what context he said it.

Altho it doesn't have ephedra in it I still think it's illegal. But then again it's Texas lol.

[IMDAZED]

Let me strip search you for a "possible" bomb strapped to your crotch area.

You don't wear pants you say?

You've never left your basement you say?

Who cares. It's time to clean up this forum.

Who's with me?

This may be hard for your peabrain to comprehend but a drug test and a strip (penis? LOL) search are kinda different. Try again because that was a bad, childish fail. How about comparing the fact that both asked for testing based on a su****ion. Makes too much sense for you?

[JOM'S]

Yeh, right. Vivek Wallace, the author who predicted a dela Hoya and Cotto win.

Also the same author who predicted a Margarito win.

Nah I don`t buy it, Vivec Wallace is a Floyd fan, not neutral at all.

You have something there bro ... even predicted a margarito win ... lolz

[Ryannn]

He drunk some splenda and that is why they needed a piss test?

Yes is hypocritical Roach.

And, I laughed at the irony... There is no absolute reason to ask for a piss test cuz of some damn sweetener... Really, sweetener, a few splenda packets for his coffee and you want a piss test?

And, even if it was hydroxycut it doesn't contain ephedra anymore... So nothing illegal, nothing based to demand a piss test on the spot.

However, the piss test didn't happen as far as I know. But, Vivik said it did... I think that is a lie by him. Howeverr, I was just skimming through it not really reading it. So I don't know in what context he said it.

to be fair, margarito was proven trying to cheat before. not the case with pacquiao.

they also still went through with the fight.

[ThePunchingBag]

This may be hard for your peabrain to comprehend but a drug test and a strip (penis? LOL) search are kinda different. Try again because that was a bad, childish fail. How about comparing the fact that both asked for testing based on a su****ion. Makes too much sense for you?

Haha. I have a peabrain, but you're not even getting the point.



What reason do I have for strip searching you for a bomb?

What reason does Floyd have for asking for additional intrusive drug tests?

Pac had a reason for asking Marg to undergo a drug tests. They found substances in his locker room.

What's Floyd's reason?

It was funny watching Roach demanding a drug test, but at least he had video evidence of Marg taking something that was clearly not water.

What does Floyd have?

[The Noose]

Good article.

His predictions on past fights have no bearing on what he was saying.

I voted NO, because Floyd and Pac have done enough to be in the top 20 already IMO. Especially Pac.

For me Floyd would be a big favourite, so him beating Pac wouldnt be as big of an acheievement as Pac beating Floyd.

[jrosales13]

to be fair, margarito was proven trying to cheat before hand. not the case with pacquiao.

they also still went through with the fight.

Beforehand a year and a half ago... They themselves said the man deserved a second chance... So give him the second chance and when he is putting splenda, do you splenda, on his coffee then give him the benefit of the doubt.

If not??????????? Then don't even sign to fight the man...

Because, to ask for a piss test on the spot cuz he put some sweetener in his coffee is ridiculous.

[ThePunchingBag]

to be fair, margarito was proven trying to cheat before hand. not the case with pacquiao.

they also still went through with the fight.

Floyd would've stopped the fight.

Pac said drugs or no drugs I'm gonna whoop his ass.

That's the difference between the two.

[IMDAZED]

Haha. I have a peabrain, but you're not even getting the point.



What reason do I have for strip searching you for a bomb?

What reason does Floyd have for asking for additional intrusive drug tests?

Pac had a reason for asking Marg to undergo a drug tests. They found substances in his locker room.

What's Floyd's reason?

It was funny watching Roach demanding a drug test, but at least he had video evidence of Marg taking something that was clearly not water.

What does Floyd have?

The same Roach had. Nothing. But a su****ion. LOL @ you thinking Splenda or Coco Cola is reason enough..do you or don't you?

[ThePunchingBag]

The same Roach had. Nothing. But a su****ion. LOL @ you thinking Splenda or Coco Cola is reason enough..do you or don't you?

Splenda, Coke, Hydroxycut, Crack *******, Heroin.

Margarito took something other than water in front of a live television camera.

That's su****ion enough.

I don't think it would've mattered either way since Pac was more skilled than Marg, but I can see why Roach would want to protect his fighter after seeing that video clip.