The misconception between curiosity and hate...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IAMBIAZED
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Oct 2010
    • 679
    • 21
    • 3
    • 6,741

    #31
    Originally posted by comanick
    The commision has rules for alot of things but i think people who dont agree with floyd use that only when it fits their point. Meaning the comission has rules/standard for ring size, glove size, weight penaltys, etc. but it is ok for manny to not go by those standards when it works in his favor. What im trying to say is if you want to go the comission route then go all the way. Do everything by their rules. But here we have fighter A who picks and chooses what rules to follow but he is well liked by the public so is ok, then we have fighter B who does the same exact thing but its not ok because he is not well liked. It is hypocritical.
    Can you show me this OST rule then? So for you, its ok for Floyd not go by those standards when it works in his favor.

    Looks like your the one using moronic arguments as long as it fits your point.

    Comment

    • deejd
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 3376
      • 88
      • 353
      • 10,029

      #32
      Originally posted by zeidrich
      does a 0 day testing really will work?

      if u said 7 days is a not enough, then ur saying that there is a steroid that can be used on a span of 6 days...

      can you just use that 6 day steroid while vacationing or maybe 2 months and 7 days before the fight?

      is full random drug test the one u need to persue... 1 whole year testing? because i personally do... this 2 month testing is ****** and would not work... and its even documented that 0 days = 7 days = 18 days by nsac...

      btw olympic drug testing is a whole year round not 2 months testing... so get off floyd **** and tell him his crusade is also a failure, 2 months will not gonna work...
      Pacquiao's camp complained about a substance in the locker room of Margarito during pre-fight. If you're worried about using hours before a fight, imagine what's out there for availability 7 days out.

      The common theme that I see amongst posters is that when you say 0 day cutoff that you're assuming that the day before the fight Pacquiao would be tested... and Pacquiao alone as well.

      In random testing, they may not test them 20 days out. Maybe they do show up 4 days before the fight, it's the beauty of random testing. Also, you have to remember that if Pacquiao is tested one day out from the fight, so will Mayweather. It's not a one way street.

      Comment

      • maguirre
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 7037
        • 543
        • 196
        • 11,164

        #33
        Originally posted by Mayabang
        Just admit that you don't want the fight to happen. You seem to be more of a Floyd fan than a Boxing Fan. Otherwise you'll criticize BOTH teams and provide a solution on how to make THE FIGHT. So the more you defend Floyd, it further proves that You don't want the megafight to happen...PERIOD.
        I don't even know why these threads are necessary. Pac have agreed to take the test up to the day of the fight long time ago and said it several times on different occasions. Koncz version clearly came from Arum's instructions. I do hope they would be tested on fight day.

        I also hope Floyd would get tested and his next opponent on the day of the fight just to prove he's serious about this random bs. Not effing 19 days cut-off.

        These peeps need to ask Floyd why he went on vacation.

        Comment

        • deejd
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2009
          • 3376
          • 88
          • 353
          • 10,029

          #34
          Originally posted by IAMBIAZED
          Can you show me this OST rule then? So for you, its ok for Floyd not go by those standards when it works in his favor.

          Looks like your the one using moronic arguments as long as it fits your point.
          Can you show us the fighting for titles at catchweights rule? Or the ten million dollar weight penalty rule? Are you able to provide those?

          Comment

          • deejd
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 3376
            • 88
            • 353
            • 10,029

            #35
            Originally posted by IAMBIAZED
            Now find me the fight where a fighter was penalized ten million dollars for every pound over...? Let me know

            -- Short memory are you teacher. Didn't FMJ went 2 pounds overweight on their fight and had to pay up?

            And the fights where titles were put on the line at catchweights?

            -- Isn't this up to the commission to decide? They decided this is alright so who are we to b!tch? Why don't you write a letter to them explaining your feelings, demand an apology and have their president write a public apology if it makes you feel better
            Again...

            What fighter was ever penalized ten million dollars for every pound over? When you find that, I'll respect your thoughts.

            Find the titles that are put on the line catchweights? Or, more specifically, Did Miguel Cotto win the 147 lb title at 145 pounds?
            Did Sergio Martinez win his 154 lb. title at 150 pounds?

            Answer those for me.

            Comment

            • Mayabang
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 3110
              • 222
              • 85
              • 9,722

              #36
              Originally posted by davis828
              Pacquiao's camp complained about a substance in the locker room of Margarito during pre-fight. If you're worried about using hours before a fight, imagine what's out there for availability 7 days out.

              The common theme that I see amongst posters is that when you say 0 day cutoff that you're assuming that the day before the fight Pacquiao would be tested... and Pacquiao alone as well.

              In random testing, they may not test them 20 days out. Maybe they do show up 4 days before the fight, it's the beauty of random testing. Also, you have to remember that if Pacquiao is tested one day out from the fight, so will Mayweather. It's not a one way street.
              dude, just give up. You're a full-time hardcore *****. Why do you keep debating...FIGHT IS NOT GONNA HAPPEN based on your opinion. So give it up, you win, NO Fight.

              lol you guys are hilarious with writing up all these OST arguments. Do you think it's gonna make a difference at all? Who are you kidding, give it up. You love Floyd, You hate Pac, and Fight won't happen.

              Comment

              • maguirre
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2010
                • 7037
                • 543
                • 196
                • 11,164

                #37
                Originally posted by davis828
                Can you show us the fighting for titles at catchweights rule? Or the ten million dollar weight penalty rule? Are you able to provide those?
                Clearly, this guy just want to argue. He's not interested in any kind of resolution. These questions of his have been answered millions of times already.

                Comment

                • IAMBIAZED
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Oct 2010
                  • 679
                  • 21
                  • 3
                  • 6,741

                  #38
                  Originally posted by davis828
                  Can you show us the fighting for titles at catchweights rule? Or the ten million dollar weight penalty rule? Are you able to provide those?
                  Can you show us the fighting for titles at catchweights rule?
                  -- You're slow. I already told you to email the commission. I didn't approve the fight as I'm not working there.

                  Or the ten million dollar weight penalty rule?
                  -- Watch JMM vs FMJ. And I thought you were an "AVID" boxing fan. Just go back a page and you should see the same answer.

                  Comment

                  • maguirre
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 7037
                    • 543
                    • 196
                    • 11,164

                    #39
                    Originally posted by IAMBIAZED
                    Can you show us the fighting for titles at catchweights rule?
                    -- You're slow. I already told you to email the commission. I didn't approve the fight as I'm not working there.

                    Or the ten million dollar weight penalty rule?
                    -- Watch JMM vs FMJ. And I thought you were an "AVID" boxing fan. Just go back a page and you should see the same answer.
                    Brah just let this guy win and leave him alone.

                    ***** support would come momentarily and let them have fun.

                    Comment

                    • IAMBIAZED
                      Interim Champion
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Oct 2010
                      • 679
                      • 21
                      • 3
                      • 6,741

                      #40
                      Originally posted by Cgarcia
                      Clearly, this guy just want to argue. He's not interested in any kind of resolution. These questions of his have been answered millions of times already.
                      Looks like someone got cornered and showed his true color and ignorance. All I wanted to accomplish was to expose this "AVID UNBIASED BOXING FAN" and was greatly disappointed. This would shame the real avid unbiased boxing fan.

                      Mission Accomplish. Good day.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP