Clottey vs Vanes martirosyan.Why not?

[AP♠]

Both promoted by top rank.
Clottey is well known and held belts.
Freddie roach is familiar with clottey.
And a win over a good defensive guy with a chin vanes can make statement.





It all reality on paper the fight seems a lil boring with the typical styles of both fighters.However,hbo already stated they dont want clottey as part of any ppvs because of his flunk of action against pacquiao.



So why not on an undercard?

[paulf]

Clottey shoudnt get another fight ever again. ever.

[AP♠]

Clottey shoudnt get another fight ever again. ever.

Im in accordance with that.

But on an undercard and a lil' bit of pressure from top rank it wouldnt hurt.

[FloydTBE]

would be o as an undercard fight defo, woudlnt mind seeing it. And as you say, it would do good if vanes was to win n get clotteys name on his record

[Slyboots]

They both bored me to death in their last fights.

[niallcollins]

that wud b a **** fight.clottey is depressin 2 watch and vanes is boring

[-PANDA-]

it would be fun to see clottey finally knocking someone out

might as well be that big mouth vanes

[Pullcounter]

Both promoted by top rank.
Clottey is well known and held belts.
Freddie roach is familiar with clottey.
And a win over a good defensive guy with a chin vanes can make statement.





It all reality on paper the fight seems a lil boring with the typical styles of both fighters.However,hbo already stated they dont want clottey as part of any ppvs because of his flunk of action against pacquiao.



So why not on an undercard?

good match up. vanes should be able to outwork clottey, but clottey's defense will keep him in the fight. git er dun