What is a "slave contract"? Is this it?

[da_beast]

Fair enough, I will mark your answer in the "not a slave contract". Perhaps my poll options were somewhat unfair, considering there are many reasonable Brit posters who are fed up with Gaye.

But it's just beyond ridiculous at this point to be calling what the Klitschkos are offereing Gaye, a "slave contract". They are giving him a chance to achieve in 3 fights, what it took Lewis to achieve in 10 years. Not excatly "slavish" in my opinion.

I am guessing david see's himself as a legitimate world champ "which he is" and thinks it should be a level playing field. whoever brings more to the table should get more... Not my thinking but i am guessing it is his..... He wants them to have the german money and him to have the brittish money.... I am sure they could resolve the 3 fight thing but i am not too sure about where the fight will be fought or the shares of native tv money.... As i said i dont know too much about contract negotiations but thats the way i think things are going down from what i have read. but i dont believe everything i read

[dvb]

not exactly slave contracts,but certantly disrepctful and greedy ones.

why would the supposed best heavyweights ask for rematches if they think that they are the best in the division?.

why would ****** rich no 1 and no 2 in the division need more money from some one elses country and someone elses tv network?.

ide believe vitali did agree the deal face to face with haye,but then when the contracts came through it had 3 fights and more money unfairly requested!.

their both stalling,putting blocks on the fights agaisnt haye,like floyd has been with pacman.

they like floyd are afraid of someone being a genuine prime fighter who is a real threat and style clash to them,someone who could actually beat them,and beat them bad.

the day that the klitschkos come out with reasons to why there contracts werent made i might take them more serious!.

and when they start to give a crap about entertaining people like they should maybe they can get some credit too.

i hate them being boring,safety first,fighting nododies and hasbeens like chisora's and briggses of the boxing world!.

tell me why they havent fought valuev when he had the title?,or even a still fit and skilfull holyfield?. or even a outshape but skilfull toney!.

[Tiozzo]

Is it a slave contract to be offered 50/50 of the biggest money fight out there in boxing behind Pac/Mayweather? Let's also say for the sake of argument that the "you fight my brother" clause is still in there as part of the deal, is it so bad to have 3 of the highest money fights in the HW division in succession?

Also, if beating these two Ukranian future HOFs all of a sudden gave you 5 belts, plus the Ring belt, undisputed and unified status, and an almost garaunteed entry into the IBHOF, does that make it a "slave contract" then?

What if in addition to that, it is something you said you wanted all along and have already signed on to almost 2 years ago only to back out with a fake back injury two weeks prior? Is it a slave contract then?

yes it's bad

if Wlad had any balls, he would only ask for a unique rematch for himself, the ''if you kick my arse you have to fight my big bro who will hopefully soften you up so I can beat you then in your third fight against a Klitschko''

****ing *******

[Tiozzo]

Don't forget to make a selection in the poll please...

yeah, your biased poll where all the options serve only one agenda...