Comments Thread For: Haye: Drop The Slave Contract and I'll Fight a Klitschko

[The Hammer]

the article that this thread is about isn't old, he recently said this so my question is if he's lying why wouldn't Wladimir come out himself and say "no I didn't say you have to sign to 2 rematches that could be against either me or my brother"? he should come out and dead David Haye's lies if that's the case and he hasn't done that.

But Wlad has:

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=376586

[badnewsbrown]

well haye wants to be undisputed champ so he would have to fight them both anyway. why not fight them back to back if your so confdent? that would secure his legacy. i like haye but i think hes becoming more of a business man lately...

[Cafe]

What Haye is doing is revolutionary, I comend him on standing up for his rights

[FloydTBE]

wlad said at his presser with chisora that he offred exatley the same deal to haye as he did to chisora haha

[Dirk Diggler UK]

wlad said at his presser with chisora that he offred exatley the same deal to haye as he did to chisora haha

No he didnt. Warren said that Chisora accepted the deal that Haye was offered (i.e last year).

Haye made no mention of the rematch clauses in his little video that he put up expaining why the fight wasnt made. He was strictly complaining that he wanted all the UK TV money. I guess he realised people still weren't on his side so he added the bit about the rematches. He was offered 50/50 with no rematches.

[The Hammer]

wlad said at his presser with chisora that he offred exatley the same deal to haye as he did to chisora haha

He was referring to the deal Haye signed in the spring of 2009. It was the standard voluntary opponent contract with a rematch clause and an option.

However, the deal Wlad offered to Haye in May 2010 was 50-50 with no rematches and no options.

[sigrab jr]

The "fight me and my brother back to back" stuff is unfair and that's what he means by a slave contract.


The 50-50 deal on everything seems like something Haye should capitalize on it. Because imo, Haye doesn't deserve 50-50. That is like Amir Khan going up to WW, beat 2-3 mediocre WW's and being offered 50-50 for a fight with Mayweather or Pacquiao. In this case Khan is actually more popular and has more of a case to ask for 50-50 and even then he doesn't deserve it. Haye should jump on this 50-50 deal, as long as the Klitschko's drop the fight us back to back contract.

[Check_hooks]

david haye needs to brush up on the history of slavery. everyone knows hes just saying this to duck the klits cuz hes a lil b*tch

[chris2142]

david haye is wrecking there heads

david haye is wrecking there heads. by the time they fight haye will win.
cant wait to see the brothers in a real fight.

[Rick Grimes]

The "fight me and my brother back to back" stuff is unfair and that's what he means by a slave contract.


The 50-50 deal on everything seems like something Haye should capitalize on it. Because imo, Haye doesn't deserve 50-50. That is like Amir Khan going up to WW, beat 2-3 mediocre WW's and being offered 50-50 for a fight with Mayweather or Pacquiao. In this case Khan is actually more popular and has more of a case to ask for 50-50 and even then he doesn't deserve it. Haye should jump on this 50-50 deal, as long as the Klitschko's drop the fight us back to back contract.

Khan is nowhere near as popular as Pacquiao/Mayweather. Haye is bringing the most money to the fight, the Klitschko's should accept that, like Mayweather and Pacquiao did when they fought DLH.