Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Difference Between Entertainers and Fighters. Why Pacquiao is BORING!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • most fighters are boring outside of the ring, including mayweather.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Horus View Post
      The Difference Between Entertainers and Fighters. Why Pacquiao is BORING!

      Boxing is all about entertainment, drama, and mystery. Before and after the bell.

      Pacquiao after the bell ring, is one of the most entertaining fighters of all time.
      Pacquiao before the bell rings, is one of the most boring fighters of all time.


      Plain and Simple, Pacquiao has no personality. Pacquiao appeal is him being the pride and hope of the Philippines. So doing a 24/7 surrounding his journey towards his next fight will be boring because he is only 1 dimensional. How many shots can they show of him being cheered by his countrymen? So it should not be no big surprise that people find Manny Pacquiao boring before the bell rings, and when it comes to promoting a fight.


      When its comes to promotion of this fight. What Storylines can they sell concerning Pacquiao?

      Pacquiao loves his country?
      Pacquiao loves for his country is making him distracted?
      Pacquiao countrymen find hope in him?

      Where is the Drama?
      Where is the Intrigued?
      Where is the Mystery?
      Where is the Entertainment?


      Boxing is always at its peak popularity when it has fighters with Personalities.
      Historically speaking there has always been two type of draws in boxing that resonate with the fans.

      Personality Driven Fighter and Nationalistic Driven Fighter.It's rare, but sometimes 1 fighter processes both and than he is truly
      Transcendent figure.

      Personality Driven Fighter: Are fighters who are infamous,and notorious
      for the things they say as well as the way they fight. As a result, people pay to see them fight as well to see them win or lose.

      Nationalistic Driven Fighter: Are fighters who are famous by in large part due to their Nationality and how their fighting style embodies the characteristics of their Nation. As a result, their countrymen and women usually find pride in them and support them.

      Personality Driven Fighters
      Thomas Hearns
      Marvin Hagler
      Bernard Hopkins
      Roy Jones Jr
      Hector Camacho

      Nationalistic Driven Fighter:
      Julio Ceaser Chavez
      Manny Pacquiao
      Alexis Arguello
      Felix Trinidad
      Miguel Cotto
      Antonio Margarito
      Wladimir Klitschko
      Joe Calzaghe


      Both(Personality + Nationality)
      Muhammad Ali
      Mike Tyson
      Roberto Duran
      Oscar De La Hoya
      Floyd Mayweather Jr.
      Jake LaMotta
      Sugar Ray Robinson
      Sugar Ray Leonard
      Ricky Hatton
      Rocky Marciano
      David Haye
      Gatti



      So instead of some of you guys getting upset that people find pacquiao's 24/7 and interviews boring, just understand that Pacquiao draw is not based on him having a personality. So do not get upset when people say he is boring.
      Because you know what? He is.
      Adj. Envious - showing extreme cupidity; painfully desirous of another's advantages; "he was never covetous before he met her"; "jealous of his success and covetous of his possessions"; "envious of their art collection"
      covetous, jealous
      desirous, wishful
      - having or expressing desire for something; "desirous of high office"; "desirous of finding a quick solution to the problem"

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Eaner0919 View Post
        I did and to be honest I am not sure why you feel FB and Twitter is an integral part of how Manny can gain more US access.

        he is not a showman yet people still gravitate to him

        he is not flashy nor a big talker yet people still come to see him fight, watch his PPVs and adore him

        calling attention to himself on twitter or FB isn't going to enhance that

        different fighters have different styles. Some find what others find boring as entertaining or at the very least viewable

        see I think you see brash and self promoting as important kind of like how you are personally

        you create these threads largely to call attention to yourself and for the most part it works because people come to these threads

        but something lacks and always has Horus. A genuine sense that you get something out of these threads as someone perusing this. Much like those who critique Floyd sure they come to watch him fight but a lot of times they leave feeling cheated, kind of like your threads

        now Manny by contrast is all sound and fury he is basically a man of few words, kind of boring, kind of middle of the road, he talks really bad trash and he probably knows it

        however he is one thing you could never comprehend and something you clearly overlook much like you clearly are avoiding my simple little question as to whether you have seen Pacquiao fight.

        he is endearing to his fans. He is the epitome of speak softly and carry a big stick. When fans go into a Manny fight they know exactly what they get so they know if they purchase a ticket chances are they won't be disappointed

        and I asked you whether you have been to a Manny fight for several reasons

        1. you would then have firsthand knowledge as to what the crowd at a Pacquiao fight consists of not just speculation and assumption that non Asian people went because they were comped

        2. you would get a firsthand view of what it's like to see a crowd energized by him. You would know how endeared he is to his fans and how loyal they are to him and ....and he has yet to disappoint them even in losing fashion.

        3. going to fights is unlike sitting on here and speculating what it is like. You would know had you attended any and I think your assessment wouldn't be so media driven

        Truth right here.. Well said Eaner..

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
          HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! That made me laugh hysterically!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by kadyo View Post
            to be more correct, i'd avoid point estimation, so i'd go for an interval of 15-25 with a margin of error of 5%.

            i'm sure horus knows what i'm talking about.
            Lol Kaydo, Green K my friend.
            But even 15-25 is too wide of a range.
            I would used 5-10 as my average per fight if I were to averaged.
            because if you used 20 as your AVERAGE. that means more than 45% of total sample is more than 20 people per party.
            Last edited by Horus; 10-26-2010, 10:03 AM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by V-3 View Post
              Why you want to fight dude? Did I miss something?
              Im curious too, I told him to PM ME and he never did.
              People get real tough on a keyboard now and days.

              Comment


              • I find it funny that you seek answers YET

                have not answered my simple little question even AFTER I answered your repeated questions as to why I asked

                so

                how many Manny Pacquiao fights have you attended? honest straight forward answer is all I seek

                I will wait

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Eaner0919 View Post
                  I find it funny that you seek answers YET

                  have not answered my simple little question even AFTER I answered your repeated questions as to why I asked

                  so

                  how many Manny Pacquiao fights have you attended? honest straight forward answer is all I seek

                  I will wait
                  Carnal, I think you and I and everybody who has read this thread no the answer to that question.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
                    Carnal, I think you and I and everybody who has read this thread no the answer to that question.
                    oh I know that

                    just merely pointing out his hypocritical ways in which he wants people to give him answers but yet will never answer a question himself

                    also showing how while some of us on here have indeed never been to a fight, they do not act like the be all end all Horus does

                    this is sort of my completion of this lesson

                    class?

                    dismissed

                    Comment


                    • Pacquiao might not the most technically sane, but boring? I can't agree with that statement.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP