Dereck Chisora delighted with three-fight deal for Klitschkos' titles

[Rick Grimes]

And if you really believe that rubbish you're even more gullible that you appear to be.

Why is it everyone lies apart from the Klitschko's?

[toysale]

It's 200k for the first fight then if he wins it goes 50/50 i assume. It's definately £200,000 for the first fight though according to sky sports but who cares, at least he's signed!

[Dave Rado]

Why is it everyone lies apart from the Klitschko's?

Why are you so naive and gullible? Haye doesn't deny that he was offered 50% of the purse. You know damn well that Chisora wouldn't be offered anywhere near 50%. Even if he was Wlad's mandatory he would only be entitled to 25% so why on earth would Wlad offer him 50%? And if you don't know that Mitchell is a Klitschko hater then you really have no credibility.

[Dave Rado]

It's 200k for the first fight then if he wins it goes 50/50 i assume. It's definately £200,000 for the first fight though according to sky sports but who cares, at least he's signed!

£200k plus a share of the PPV.

In any case, nothing remotely similar to what Haye was offered.

[Rick Grimes]

Why are you so naive and gullible? Haye doesn't deny that he was offered 50% of the purse. You know damn well that Chisora wouldn't be offered anywhere near 50%. Even if he was Wlad's mandatory he would only be entitled to 25% so why on earth would Wlad offer him 50%? And if you don't know that Mitchell is a Klitschko hater then you really have no credibility.

Mitchell might be a Klitschko hater but it's warren that said it's 50/50, what reason would he have to lie about it?

[Dave Rado]

Mitchell might be a Klitschko hater but it's warren that said it's 50/50, what reason would he have to lie about it?

His exact words are "there is a 50/50 agreement in it". That doesn't mean he'll get 50/50 in the first fight. If he was really offered that much it would have been far more than he deserved and he certainly wouldn't have called it crap. As someone else said, he was probably offered 50/50 in a rematch should he win the first fight.

It may possibly be similar terms to what Haye was offered a year ago, but is certainly not what Haye turned down this year.

And note that Warren calls it a great deal and says he doesn't understand what Haye's problem is.

[Famoso Matador]

...." I'm from the streets. I'm wiser than them. "....

There is another reality check before then, though. Chisora has pleaded guilty to charges of assault and theft dating from 28 May and is due in the City of Westminster magistrates court on 10 November for a pre-sentencing report. Warren says he does not expect the court case to affect the fight.

Doesn't sound very wise to me.

[Rick Grimes]

His exact words are "there is a 50/50 agreement in it". That doesn't mean he'll get 50/50 in the first fight. If he was really offered that much it would have been far more than he deserved and he certainly wouldn't have called it crap. As someone else said, he was probably offered 50/50 in a rematch should he win the first fight.

It may possibly be similar terms to what Haye was offered a year ago, but is certainly not what Haye turned down this year.

And note that Warren calls it a great deal and says he doesn't understand what Haye's problem is.

Warrens exact words are "This is a three-fight deal, the same deal that was offered to David Haye."

But Dave Rado knows more than the man that has seen the contract.

[Dave Rado]

Warrens exact words are "This is a three-fight deal, the same deal that was offered to David Haye."

But Dave Rado knows more than the man that has seen the contract.

Haye was offered a three fight deal last year. This year he was offered a deal with no rematch clauses. You don't need to see the contract to know that because Haye admits it. And he didn't say the money was the same as the money Haye was offered, only that they were both offered a three fight deal. But that's a year out of date and you know it. The deal Haye turned down this year was not a three fight deal.

[Rick Grimes]

Haye was offered a three fight deal last year. This year he was offered a deal with no rematch clauses. You don't need to see the contract to know that because Haye admits it. And he didn't say the money was the same as the money Haye was offered, only that they were both offered a three fight deal. But that's a year out of date and you know it. The deal Haye turned down this year was not a three fight deal.

He also says that there is a 50/50 agreement, but instead of taking Warren's word Dave Rado knows it's only for a rematch.