I was thinking this morning and realize that David Haye has no plans in fighting either Klits. So instead I thought what's the next big thing, maybe he can fight Adamek. I honestly don't think he can beat Adamek, but what do you guys think.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Haye vs Adamek, who ya got?
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
-
Originally posted by PAC&PBFsuck View PostI thought that but then I realized that Adamek has a very good chin. Plus he has been tested, Haye hasn't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hottamale View PostI wouldn't say he has a very good chin at HW. Tested, when? Adamek hasn't fought tougher opponents then Haye, if anything it's the other way around.
Arreola= Valuev. Valuev hasnt won since 2008 and looks like hes aged badly and he lost to Chagaev prior and Holyfield imo.
Michael Grant=John Ruiz for different reasons. Ruiz gave Haye a chance to check out his punching power at HW and see if he had a chance to hurt a klitschko. Grant let Adamek see how he'd do against the height.
Golata=Monte Barrett- Barrett looked good against TUa, but at that time he was just a paycheck collecting former name that was there collecting a check.
Id say its fairly even with neither one really being tested imo.
Comment
-
adamek at HW is fast and has much better technique and stamina. he works the body and he can jab. haye seems like he gets jab by everyone and he gets droped he has a very low workrate. he carries a bigger HW punch than adamek but i dont feel hes active enough to beat tomas. i see adamek droping haye once or twice and either winning by decision or late stoppage
Comment
-
And I got Adamek by MD. Think Adamek has much better stamina. Has a good chin, not fantastic, but good enough to weather a few mistakes and a few shots from Haye, he has good skill to outbox haye which should offset Haye's speed advantage. Its a fairly equal fight IMO until round 10 where I see Adamek's superior stamina taking over.
Comment
Comment