Tweet
It's all in the term pfp!!Lately I've been pointing out a couple facts as to why the top 2 fighters pfp are quite similar to each other,but I couldn't break through!!It's the term pfp!!
More than a little I've observed posters on boxing scene paying more attention to that term than any thing else!!Pfp is a term used to describe a what if when comparing fighters regardless of weight,for example:Pacman probably can never beat Jeff Lacey in real life,this is where pfp comes in!!If they were pfp the same size,then Pacman destroys him!!
I say this because people disregard titles or the term"champion",which is a little surprising to me!!Because in the weight divisions,there are actual champions there & belts who have a real impact in any weightclass!!They shouldn't be regarded as nothing!!
I would love some imput into why fightfans pay more attention to this term,than an actual title,or the men fighting for it!!Since in reality,the term pfp cannot be applied to reality??
More than a little I've observed posters on boxing scene paying more attention to that term than any thing else!!Pfp is a term used to describe a what if when comparing fighters regardless of weight,for example:Pacman probably can never beat Jeff Lacey in real life,this is where pfp comes in!!If they were pfp the same size,then Pacman destroys him!!
I say this because people disregard titles or the term"champion",which is a little surprising to me!!Because in the weight divisions,there are actual champions there & belts who have a real impact in any weightclass!!They shouldn't be regarded as nothing!!
I would love some imput into why fightfans pay more attention to this term,than an actual title,or the men fighting for it!!Since in reality,the term pfp cannot be applied to reality??
Comment