Bernard Hopkins vs. Robert Allen

[Bastian Loc]

Lol,

That list looks pretty comparable to Vitaly's.....

Like takin candy from a baby

Candyass.

Vitali k.o's bums.

Bernard goes 12 boring rounds with them while fondling their genitals.

[Bastian Loc]

He hasn't fought Pascal yet to my recollectioin. I think you are being too hard on Hopkins. I'm kind of in the middle where B-Hop is concerned. I'm not a hater or a hardcore fanatic. But I respect his accomplishments and I think an absolute prime Hopkins gives any Middleweight in history fits win or lose.

Because he would try to wrestle with them.

I put Pascal there because its obvious he's going to win. Whether he k.o's Poopkins or whether Poopkins tries to spoil and the judges rob him (rightfully) he's losing either way.

The only way Poop wins is by k.o.

And we know that ain't happening.

[-Lucas-]

Both bums. Floyd would have to redo his entire career since 2002 to be considered an ATG.

No one fight could save him.

So you had 20 minutes to come up with a response after initially ducking my response, and you come up with this crap.....

Sigh....... your past prime man, give it up man

[-Lucas-]

Candyass.

Vitali k.o's bums.

Bernard goes 12 boring rounds with them while fondling their genitals.

Last time I checked, there are no extra points for scoring a KO...

Nice try tho

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

Last time I checked, there are no extra points for scoring a KO...

Nice try tho

A KO means 'points' aren't necessary.


Résumé points? Of course a KO looks more impressive on a record than a decision. A win is a win, but a KO = extra credit.

[-Lucas-]

A KO means 'points' aren't necessary.


Résumé points? Of course a KO looks more impressive on a record than a decision. A win is a win, but a KO = extra credit.

Generally, I agree. But he ****s on Hokins for fighting bums, but at the same time had Vitaly as his ATG heavyweight. Then calls Lewis a bum.

Dont make sense.

[intoccabile]

A KO means 'points' aren't necessary.


Résumé points? Of course a KO looks more impressive on a record than a decision. A win is a win, but a KO = extra credit.

a UD is much more impressive than a KO.

[Heeb]

A KO means 'points' aren't necessary.


Résumé points? Of course a KO looks more impressive on a record than a decision. A win is a win, but a KO = extra credit.

I don't necessarily agree. I think a dominant UD is better than a puncher's chance, behind on the cards KO. Although, in Vitali's case, he dominates the opponent and KOs them, so I agree in this situation.

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

a UD is much more impressive than a KO.

So, just to go with a recent example, if Cotto had prodded Judah to a UD instead of turning the heat up when he was in control of the fight, that would've been more impressive than closing the show?

Or, using a more competetive example, if Pryor hadn't closed the show late against Arguello, that would've been more impressive (he was up on two cards IIRC)?

GTFO.


In the case of guys who lack a big punch, I give passes for controlling decisions in some instances. Whitaker gets many from me, for example. Mayweather up to a point. But, general rule of thumb, KO = extra credit.

[Bastian Loc]

Last time I checked, there are no extra points for scoring a KO...

Nice try tho

Style points bitch.

The difference between Fraud and Pac.

One goes 12 with bums, the other kttfo...