Cotto by knockout in a fan friendly fight. Ricky had no chin at 147.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miguel Cotto (2007) vs Ricky Hatton (2007), who wins at 147 lbs?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by 2120 View Postcotto wins at 147
but at 140 the fight could go either way but i would favor cotto
@47, Cotto ko's him, at @40, close...hard to tell. Ricky was good at lower weight. Very fast and great stamina. Pit that against Cotto's shortened length of stamina and Ricky stands a good chance.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jazluvr@47, Cotto ko's him, at @40, close...hard to tell. Ricky was good at lower weight. Very fast and great stamina. Pit that against Cotto's shortened length of stamina and Ricky stands a good chance.
Comment
-
-
-
I never saw a difference in Hatton; when he moved up to 147. Just that he faught better opposition at WW and he couldn't control these much bigger men; which was a major part of his style. When I say that Hatton would have beat Cotto at 140, that's more due to Cotto struggling to make 140. Cotto at 140 could hardly take a punch, and no offense, but I saw nothing in Cotto that told me he could handle Hatton at 140. I think Hatton would be all over him and force a stoppage in the mid to late rounds. Now at 147 Cotto wins, no doubt about that. Cotto's conditioning/ ability to take a punch improved greatly as he moved up, his strength also improved.
Comment
-
At 147 Miguel would destroy Rickey. At 140 it would be a close fight but imo Cotto would beat him at that weight as well. I think people get out of hand when they say that Hatton simply beats Cotto at 140 because that was Hattons best weight. Yeah, at one point Miguel had some struggles making weight but even at 140 he was a good puncher and Hattons style really wouldn't benefit him well against Cotto. Hatton comes in, he gets hit by a stronger man. Hatton tries to box, he gets boxed by a better boxer. Hatton was a good fighter but I doubt he beats Miguel ever.Last edited by Check; 10-17-2010, 05:54 PM.
Comment
Comment