Would the klitschko brothers fighting each other prove anything?

[sterling]

I was just thinking if them two fought alot of people say it wuold crown finally the best in the heavywieght division but would it even save the division?

All it would prove that one brother is better then the other?
what if the other brother wins the rematch then they never fight each other again becuz of injury or by choice ?

I think even if these two fight each other the division would still be the same and i think it would be even worse because you wouldnet have 2 dominate champs to choose from.

Do you really want all the heavywieght title fights to be against WLAD?

[sterling]

views?....

[AmiraanBoxer]

i see your point ... but it wont prove anything .. itll only prove which brother is better .. i have to respect these guys .. i didnt before but ive grown to respect them .. regardless of their safety first styles theyve beaten everyone put infront of them .. theyve lost and come back .. despite being in a ****ty era .. well ****ty is an understatement with every HW fighter training in Mcdonalds , theyve done what they had to do .. , hall of famers for sure ..

if you look at tyson , he was a beast , but his era was not that great either it was as bad actually and beating a blown up light heavy weight in spinks didnt prove **** .. , although im more of a tyson fan i cant say his era of fighters were any better (im talking about tysons era late 80's early 90's and not the holyfield and bowes that came when he went to prison) .

good post

[OptimusWolf]

It could prove loads - like who has the more heart, who has the better defence, who has the better footwork etc etc.

The reasons they should fight are exactly the same as the reasons other boxers fight. I think it will never happen and completely understand why, but that doesn't stop it being a shame from another point of view.

[Rick Grimes]

All Mayweather - Pacquiao would prove is one is better than the other, i guess they shouldn't fight either.

[ny123]

It think it would prove Vitaly is the better fighter where it counts in the ring. What i mean by that is Wlad is the harder puncher and more polished guy but in a head to head match up with Vitaly his lack of toughness and weak chin would be exposed by a fighter who could take a punch and wouldnt allow himself to be jabbed and held all night long.

[sterling]

It think it would prove Vitaly is the better fighter where it counts in the ring. What i mean by that is Wlad is the harder puncher and more polished guy but in a head to head match up with Vitaly his lack of toughness and weak chin would be exposed by a fighter who could take a punch and wouldnt allow himself to be jabbed and held all night long.

yh we all know vitali is tougher tho